William L. Ashburn

136 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

William L. Ashburn
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.5k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.2k
  • Surgery 1.1k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 694
  • Biomedical Engineering 398
Replace Frans J. Th. Wackers with:
Frans J. Th. Wackers United States
W. Bleifeld Germany
K.I. Lie Netherlands
Patrick J. Scanlon United States
Henry D. Royal United States
Melvin P. Judkins United States
Jack E. Juni United States
Alan D. Waxman United States
Antoinette S. Gomes United States
Lewis Wexler United States
William L. Ashburn relative to Frans J. Th. Wackers United States Frans J. Th. Wackers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Frans J. Th. Wackers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Ashburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Ashburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Ashburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Ashburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Ashburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Ashburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Ashburn. The network helps show where William L. Ashburn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Ashburn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Ashburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Ashburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Ashburn. William L. Ashburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 64
3 5
4 15
5 3
6 12
7 21
8 10
9 2
10 16
11 12
12 11
13 55
14 24
15 86
16 87
17
Loculation as a contraindication intracavitary 32P-chromic phosphate therapy.
20
18
A Simple and Efficient Method of Dissolving 133Xe into Saline
1
19 19
20
Digital and analog processing of Anger camera data with a dedicated computer--controlled system.
11

About William L. Ashburn

William L. Ashburn is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 141 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (53 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (28 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.2k citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (234 citations). William L. Ashburn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Nigeria and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Slutsky, Joel S. Karliner, Victor F. Froelicher, Alexander Battler, Heinrich R. Schelbert, John Ross, J.W. Verba, Kirk L. Peterson, Hartmut Henning and Matthias Pfisterer. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026