William D. Phillips
- Neurology top 2%
- Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma 14
- Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders 10
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 12
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 5
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Cellular transport and secretion 10
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Ion channel regulation and function 25
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders 6
- Rehabilitation top 5%
-
- Antifungal resistance and susceptibility 6
- Co-authors
- Othon GervásioStephen ReddelJohn P. MerliePeter G. NoakesMarco MorschMax R. BennettNazanin GhazanfariDavid G. Allen
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William D. Phillips
86 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Neurology 588
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 683
- Cell Biology 398
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Rehabilitation 96
Countries citing papers authored by William D. Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Phillips. The network helps show where William D. Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William D. Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 59 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 76 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 74 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 118 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 23 | |
| 17 | Recent operating experience in Europe and the Soviet Union with fire resistant turbine lubricants | 1990 | 1 |
| 18 | 1989 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1952 | 3 |
About William D. Phillips
William D. Phillips is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (25 papers), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (10 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (10 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (6 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (6 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (588 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (683 citations) and Cell Biology (398 citations). William D. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Othon Gervásio, Stephen Reddel, John P. Merlie, Peter G. Noakes, Marco Morsch, Max R. Bennett, Nazanin Ghazanfari, David G. Allen, Shyuan T. Ngo and E. L. Muetterties.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.