William D. Phillips
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Othon GervásioStephen ReddelJohn P. MerliePeter G. NoakesMarco MorschMax R. BennettNazanin GhazanfariDavid G. Allen
- Topics
- Ion channel regulation and function (25 papers)Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (14 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William D. Phillips
86 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 683
- Neurology 588
- Cell Biology 398
- Physiology 192
Countries citing papers authored by William D. Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Phillips. The network helps show where William D. Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William D. Phillips
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William D. Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William D. Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William D. Phillips. William D. Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 76 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 74 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 118 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | Recent operating experience in Europe and the Soviet Union with fire resistant turbine lubricants | 1 |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About William D. Phillips
William D. Phillips is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (25 papers), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (14 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (588 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (683 citations) and Cell Biology (398 citations). William D. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Othon Gervásio, Stephen Reddel, John P. Merlie, Peter G. Noakes, Marco Morsch, Max R. Bennett, Nazanin Ghazanfari, David G. Allen, Shyuan T. Ngo and E. L. Muetterties. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.