William C. Carter

499 total citations
14 papers, 372 citations indexed

About

William C. Carter is a scholar working on Hardware and Architecture, Literature and Literary Theory and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. Carter has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 372 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Hardware and Architecture, 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in William C. Carter's work include French Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (2 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper). William C. Carter is often cited by papers focused on French Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (2 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper). William C. Carter collaborates with scholars based in United States. William C. Carter's co-authors include Peter R. Schneider, Daniël Brand, William H. Joyner, Stephen N. Rous, W. G. Bouricius, Alexander Birman, Fletcher C. Derrick and Martin Goldfield and has published in prestigious journals such as Urology, Postgraduate Medicine and Design Automation Conference.

In The Last Decade

William C. Carter

12 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William C. Carter United States 8 242 229 70 59 48 14 372
Vivek Nair United States 7 164 0.7× 234 1.0× 27 0.4× 53 0.9× 89 1.9× 37 323
Viraphol Chaiyakul United States 10 243 1.0× 113 0.5× 47 0.7× 17 0.3× 77 1.6× 16 280
W. M. vanCleemput United States 9 163 0.7× 216 0.9× 33 0.5× 18 0.3× 57 1.2× 23 282
E. D. Lagnese United States 4 270 1.1× 133 0.6× 35 0.5× 20 0.3× 112 2.3× 4 295
Martin Horauer Austria 9 149 0.6× 85 0.4× 57 0.8× 23 0.4× 121 2.5× 55 256
Mahesh A. Iyer United States 13 447 1.8× 442 1.9× 42 0.6× 19 0.3× 32 0.7× 34 507
Mikel Azkarate-Askasua Spain 9 216 0.9× 100 0.4× 21 0.3× 26 0.4× 76 1.6× 23 253
Ian Broster United Kingdom 12 332 1.4× 44 0.2× 132 1.9× 23 0.4× 179 3.7× 21 378
Suk Suk United States 7 221 0.9× 192 0.8× 6 0.1× 20 0.3× 38 0.8× 20 308
Eric Felt United States 10 288 1.2× 385 1.7× 41 0.6× 14 0.2× 12 0.3× 15 423

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Carter. The network helps show where William C. Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Carter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Carter. William C. Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Carter, William C.. (2006). Proust in Love. Yale University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
2.
Carter, William C.. (2006). Proust in Love. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2 indexed citations
3.
Derrick, Fletcher C., et al.. (1987). Obtaining correct size and degree of inflation or deflation of ams hydroflex penile prosthesis. Urology. 30(6). 582–582. 1 indexed citations
4.
Carter, William C.. (1982). Signature Testing with Guaranteed Bounds for Fault Coverage.. International Test Conference. 75–82. 14 indexed citations
5.
Carter, William C. & Stephen N. Rous. (1981). Gross hematuria in 110 adult urologic hospital patients. Urology. 18(4). 342–344. 23 indexed citations
6.
Carter, William C., William H. Joyner, & Daniël Brand. (1979). Symbolic Simulation for Correct Machine Design. Design Automation Conference. 280–286. 27 indexed citations
7.
Derrick, Fletcher C. & William C. Carter. (1979). Kidney stone disease. Postgraduate Medicine. 66(4). 115–125. 1 indexed citations
8.
Carter, William C., William H. Joyner, & Daniël Brand. (1978). Microprogram verification considered necessary.. 657–664. 30 indexed citations
9.
Joyner, William H., William C. Carter, & Daniël Brand. (1978). Using Machine Descriptions in Program Verification.. 515–522. 10 indexed citations
10.
Carter, William C., et al.. (1974). Some Techniques for Microprogram Validation.. IFIP Congress. 76–80. 10 indexed citations
11.
Carter, William C. & Peter R. Schneider. (1968). Design of dynamically checked computers.. IFIP Congress. 878–883. 234 indexed citations
12.
Bouricius, W. G., et al.. (1967). PHASE II OF AN ARCHITECTURAL STUDY FOR A SELF-REPAIRING COMPUTER.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 14 indexed citations
13.
Carter, William C., et al.. (1966). Ecology of Arbovirus Infection in New Jersey: Review of a 5-Year Mist-Netting Program. Bird-Banding. 37(3). 183–183. 2 indexed citations
14.
Carter, William C.. (1962). Mathematical Analysis of Merge-Sorting Techniques.. IFIP Congress. 62–66. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026