William Baker
Impact in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Gene expression and cancer classification
- RNA modifications and cancer
- Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
-
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Papers in
-
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 1
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 1
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 1
- Co-authors
- Mark Knight (1 shared paper)Emma Mason (1 shared paper)William Clarke (1 shared paper)Neal R. Norrick (1 shared paper)Byron Anderson (1 shared paper)Peter Henderson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Library Review (3 papers)English Studies (1 paper)Neophilologus (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)Nucleic Acids Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William Baker
8 papers receiving 773 citations
William Baker's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Molecular Biology 614
- Ecology 116
- Information Systems and Management 29
- Genetics 87
- Immunology 61
Countries citing papers authored by William Baker
This map shows the geographic impact of William Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Baker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Baker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Baker. The network helps show where William Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside William Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 789 |
| 2 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 3 | The letters of Wilkie Collins | 1999 | 10 |
| 4 | 1977 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 10 | Trotsky's Vision of Libraries. | 1991 | 0 |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 |
About William Baker
William Baker is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations and Ecology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper), Mormonism, Religion, and History (1 paper), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (614 citations), Ecology (116 citations), Information Systems and Management (29 citations), Genetics (87 citations) and Immunology (61 citations). William Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Knight, Emma Mason, William Clarke, Neal R. Norrick, Byron Anderson and Peter Henderson. Their work appears in journals such as Library Review, English Studies, Neophilologus, The Modern Language Review and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.