Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Henderson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Henderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Henderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Henderson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Henderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Henderson. The network helps show where Peter Henderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Henderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Henderson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Henderson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Henderson. Peter Henderson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Henderson, Peter & Nishadi De Silva. (2008). System architecture induces document architecture. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 327–332.2 indexed citations
Henderson, Peter & Robert John Walters. (1999). Modelling Component-based Systems as an aid to Design Validation. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
9.
Hartel, Pieter, Michael Butler, Andrew Currie, et al.. (1999). Questions and Answers About Ten Formal Methods. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).5 indexed citations
10.
Henderson, Peter, et al.. (1998). The Cellular Manufacturing Process Model: Planning a Complex Software And Systems Integration Project. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
11.
Henderson, Peter. (1997). Formal Models of Process Components. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).10 indexed citations
12.
Henderson, Peter, et al.. (1991). Why Execute Formal Specifications?. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
13.
Henderson, Peter & Brian Warboys. (1991). Configuration Description for Component Reuse. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
14.
Henderson, Peter. (1987). Proceedings of the second ACM SIGSOFT/SIGPLAN software engineering symposium on Practical software development environments.11 indexed citations
15.
Henderson, Peter, et al.. (1986). Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT/SIGPLAN Software Engineering Symposium on Pratical Software Development Environments : Palo Alto, California, December 9-11, 1986. Association for Computing Machinery eBooks.
Henderson, Peter, et al.. (1979). The maintenance of software with multiple versions. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
19.
Henderson, Peter. (1977). An approach to compile time type checking. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 523–527.4 indexed citations
20.
Henderson, Peter, et al.. (1974). A tool for structured program development. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 204–207.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.