William A. Denny
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Toxicology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Graham J. AtwellGordon W. RewcastleBruce C. BaguleyDavid W. FryAlexander J. BridgesWilliam R. WilsonLi ZhuangBrian D. Palmer
- Topics
- Synthesis and biological activity (8 papers)Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers)Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (4 papers)
- Cited by
- ToxicologyOrganic ChemistryOncology
- Journals
- Journal of Medicinal ChemistryInternational Journal of PharmaceuticsInternational Journal of Obesity
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustralia
In The Last Decade
William A. Denny
21 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Organic Chemistry 731
- Molecular Biology 640
- Oncology 361
- Cancer Research 164
- Toxicology 116
Countries citing papers authored by William A. Denny
This map shows the geographic impact of William A. Denny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William A. Denny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William A. Denny more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William A. Denny
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William A. Denny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William A. Denny. The network helps show where William A. Denny may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William A. Denny
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William A. Denny. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William A. Denny based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William A. Denny. William A. Denny is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 223 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 127 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 60 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 58 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | 179 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 103 | |
| 19 | 137 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About William A. Denny
William A. Denny is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science and Toxicology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and biological activity (8 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (5 papers) and Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (116 citations), Organic Chemistry (731 citations) and Oncology (361 citations). William A. Denny has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Graham J. Atwell, Gordon W. Rewcastle, Bruce C. Baguley, David W. Fry, Alexander J. Bridges, William R. Wilson, Li Zhuang, Brian D. Palmer, Andrew M. Thompson and A J Kraker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and International Journal of Obesity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.