Wayne V. Nack

742 citations
13 papers · 615 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Wayne V. Nack

11 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Wayne V. Nack
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Automotive Engineering 556
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 258
  • Mechanical Engineering 353
  • Mechanics of Materials 196
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 38
Replace S. Nacivet with:
S. Nacivet France
T. Butlin United Kingdom
Daniel Hochlenert Germany
Been‐Der Yang United States
Chiara Gastaldi Italy
Lars Panning Germany
Aleksandr Sakhnevych Italy
Marc Brughmans Belgium
Olivier Chiello France
António P.V. Urgueira Portugal
Wayne V. Nack relative to S. Nacivet France S. Nacivet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
S. Nacivet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wayne V. Nack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wayne V. Nack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wayne V. Nack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wayne V. Nack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wayne V. Nack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wayne V. Nack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wayne V. Nack. The network helps show where Wayne V. Nack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Wayne V. Nack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wayne V. Nack Line = papers co-authored together Wayne V. Nack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2005342
2 199992
3 200063
4 199550
5 200332
6 200014
7 198411
8 20034
9 19814
10 19821
11 19811
12 20031
13 19970

About Wayne V. Nack

Wayne V. Nack is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Brake Systems and Friction Analysis (5 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (4 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (4 papers), Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis (4 papers), Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics (2 papers), Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research (2 papers), Vibration and Dynamic Analysis (2 papers) and Railway Engineering and Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (556 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (258 citations), Mechanical Engineering (353 citations), Mechanics of Materials (196 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (38 citations). Wayne V. Nack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Huajiang Ouyang, Yongbin Yuan, Qi‐Jun Zhang, Chong Wang, David C. Chou and E. H. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Computers & Structures, International Journal of Vehicle Design, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design and AIAA Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact