Warren R. DeBoer
- Paleontology top 2%
- Anthropology top 2%
- Archeology top 1%
- Archeology top 2%
- History top 2%
- Co-authors
- Donald W. LathrapJames A. MooreKeith KintighPaul TolstoyJohn H. BlitzPaul F. HealyCharles C. KolbRaoul Naroll
- Topics
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (12 papers)Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers)Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (6 papers)
- Cited by
- ArcheologyPaleontologyAnthropology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Warren R. DeBoer
29 papers receiving 427 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Paleontology 367
- Anthropology 275
- Archeology 110
- Archeology 96
- History 88
Countries citing papers authored by Warren R. DeBoer
This map shows the geographic impact of Warren R. DeBoer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Warren R. DeBoer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Warren R. DeBoer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Warren R. DeBoer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Warren R. DeBoer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Warren R. DeBoer. The network helps show where Warren R. DeBoer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Warren R. DeBoer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Warren R. DeBoer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Warren R. DeBoer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Warren R. DeBoer. Warren R. DeBoer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LIKE A ROLLING STONE: THE CHUNKEY GAME AND POLITICAL ORGANIZATION IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA | 6 |
| 2 | Enduring Motives: The Archaeology of Tradition and Religion in Native America | 10 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | Ceremonial centers of the Chachi | 14 |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | The making and braking of Shipibo-Conibo ceramics | 86 |
| 17 | Cumancaya : a Peruvian ceramic tradition | 17 |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Warren R. DeBoer
Warren R. DeBoer is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology and Anthropology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (12 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers) and Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (110 citations), Paleontology (367 citations) and Anthropology (275 citations). Warren R. DeBoer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Donald W. Lathrap, James A. Moore, Keith Kintigh, Paul Tolstoy, John H. Blitz, Paul F. Healy, Charles C. Kolb, Raoul Naroll, Roland Fletcher and Daniel B. Shea. Their work appears in journals such as Current Anthropology, American Antiquity and Hispanic American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.