Thomas H. Charlton
- Paleontology top 2%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 0.2%
- Anthropology top 2%
- Archeology top 2%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 2%
- Co-authors
- Deborah L. NicholsJanet Catherine BerloMichael D. GlascockHéctor NeffElizabeth M. BrumfielMary G. HodgeWilliam B. TaylorPhilip K. Hopke
- Topics
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (20 papers)Latin American history and culture (20 papers)Archaeology and Natural History (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas H. Charlton
39 papers receiving 575 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Paleontology 523
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 342
- Anthropology 308
- Archeology 118
- Geography, Planning and Development 101
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Charlton
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Charlton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Charlton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Charlton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Charlton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Charlton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Charlton. The network helps show where Thomas H. Charlton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas H. Charlton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas H. Charlton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas H. Charlton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas H. Charlton. Thomas H. Charlton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 87 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 88 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | Historical Archaeology At Plum Grove | 2 |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Tonala Brunida Ware, Past and Present | 12 |
| 13 | Excavations at Plum Grove, Iowa City, 1978 Final Report | 2 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | Post-Conquest Aztec Ceramics: Implications for Archaeological Interpretation | 20 |
About Thomas H. Charlton
Thomas H. Charlton is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Paleontology and Anthropology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (20 papers), Latin American history and culture (20 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (523 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (342 citations) and Archeology (71 citations). Thomas H. Charlton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Deborah L. Nichols, Janet Catherine Berlo, Michael D. Glascock, Héctor Neff, Elizabeth M. Brumfiel, Deborah L. Nichols, Mary G. Hodge, William B. Taylor, Philip K. Hopke and David C. Grove. Their work appears in journals such as Science, American Anthropologist and Current Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.