Dumbarton Oaks

56 total papers · 1.7k total citations
42 papers, 578 citations indexed

About

Dumbarton Oaks is a scholar working on Archeology, History and Visual Arts and Performing Arts. According to data from OpenAlex, Dumbarton Oaks has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 578 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Archeology, 8 papers in History and 7 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts. Recurrent topics in Dumbarton Oaks's work include Latin American history and culture (6 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (6 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers). Dumbarton Oaks is often cited by papers focused on Latin American history and culture (6 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (6 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers). Dumbarton Oaks collaborates with scholars based in . Dumbarton Oaks's co-authors include William H. Isbell, Gordon F. McEwan, Leonardo López Luján, William L. Fash, Elizabeth P. Benson, R. M. Harrison, Henry Maguire, Elizabeth Hill Boone, Gary Urton and John W. Nesbitt and has published in prestigious journals such as Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida), The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

Dumbarton Oaks

36 papers receiving 442 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Dumbarton Oaks 276 226 170 152 89 42 578
Rebecca Storey 289 1.0× 71 0.3× 151 0.9× 199 1.3× 81 0.9× 28 511
C. R. Whittaker 226 0.8× 52 0.2× 334 2.0× 219 1.4× 60 0.7× 23 688
Frederic Hicks 337 1.2× 286 1.3× 254 1.5× 70 0.5× 67 0.8× 27 635
Henri J. M. Claessen 133 0.5× 42 0.2× 170 1.0× 44 0.3× 57 0.6× 44 554
Luis Jaime Castillo 272 1.0× 143 0.6× 205 1.2× 126 0.8× 88 1.0× 15 512
Thomas P. Myers 357 1.3× 91 0.4× 300 1.8× 154 1.0× 83 0.9× 32 596
John R. Topic 336 1.2× 154 0.7× 196 1.2× 85 0.6× 122 1.4× 15 504
R. Alan Covey 281 1.0× 191 0.8× 127 0.7× 82 0.5× 135 1.5× 33 518
Joan‐Pau Rubiés 75 0.3× 67 0.3× 245 1.4× 63 0.4× 68 0.8× 36 582
Traci Ardren 334 1.2× 150 0.7× 219 1.3× 144 0.9× 94 1.1× 47 579

Countries citing papers authored by Dumbarton Oaks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dumbarton Oaks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dumbarton Oaks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dumbarton Oaks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dumbarton Oaks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dumbarton Oaks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dumbarton Oaks. The network helps show where Dumbarton Oaks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dumbarton Oaks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dumbarton Oaks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dumbarton Oaks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dumbarton Oaks. Dumbarton Oaks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026