Walter Schroyens

829 total citations
47 papers, 536 citations indexed

About

Walter Schroyens is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Artificial Intelligence and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Walter Schroyens has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 536 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in General Decision Sciences, 22 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Walter Schroyens's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (25 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (11 papers). Walter Schroyens is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (25 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (11 papers). Walter Schroyens collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Canada and France. Walter Schroyens's co-authors include Walter Schaeken, Géry d’Ydewalle, Marc Brysbaert, Françoise Vitu, Simon J. Handley, Kristien Dieussaert, Niki Verschueren, Wim Fias, Senne Braem and Henry Markovits and has published in prestigious journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition and Neuropsychology.

In The Last Decade

Walter Schroyens

46 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Walter Schroyens

DEP

GDS

ECP

Jean-François Lecas France

Orlando Espino Spain

Klaus Oberauer Germany

Isabel Orenes Spain

Gary W. Cantor United States

Brian Leahy Germany

C. J. Brainerd United States

André Aßfalg Germany

Emily Liquin United States

R. Brooke Lea United States

Jean-François Lecas France

Walter Schroyens

164 ×0.7

DEP

116 ×0.5

GDS

101 ×0.5

81 ×0.4

66 ×0.8

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Walter Schroyens Walter Schroyens (= 1×) peers Jean-François Lecas

Countries citing papers authored by Walter Schroyens

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Walter Schroyens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Walter Schroyens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walter Schroyens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Walter Schroyens

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Walter Schroyens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Walter Schroyens. The network helps show where Walter Schroyens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Walter Schroyens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Walter Schroyens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Walter Schroyens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Walter Schroyens. Walter Schroyens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Schroyens, Walter, et al.. (2010). General aptitude and the assumption of truth in deductively rational reasoning about probable but false antecedent to consequent relations. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 6(-1). 88–102. 1 indexed citations

Schroyens, Walter. (2009). Mistaking the instance for the rule: A critical analysis of the truth-table evaluation paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 63(2). 246–259. 12 indexed citations

Schroyens, Walter. (2009). On is an ought: Levels of analysis and the descriptive versus normative analysis of human reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32(1). 101–102. 7 indexed citations

Schroyens, Walter, et al.. (2008). Truth table tasks: The relevance of irrelevant. Thinking & Reasoning. 14(4). 409–433. 9 indexed citations

Schroyens, Walter & Walter Schaeken. (2008). Deductive rationality in validating and testing conditional inferences.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 62(3). 163–173. 3 indexed citations

Schroyens, Walter. (2007). The Principle of Charity in Interpreting Scientific Theory: A Meta-Theoretical Polemic Against Theoretical Polemics. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 29(29). 2 indexed citations

Schroyens, Walter. (2007). Issues in Reasoning about Iffy Propositions: "The" Interpretation of Conditionals. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 29(29). 2 indexed citations

Dieussaert, Kristien, et al.. (2006). The truth about possibilities-based and truth-based truth table tasks. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28). 2141–2145. 2 indexed citations

Schroyens, Walter, et al.. (2006). Issues in Reasoning about Iffy Propositions: Reasoning Times in the Syntactic-Semantic Counter-Example Prompted Probabilistic Thinking and Reasoning Engine. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28). 762–767. 3 indexed citations

10.

Schaeken, Walter & Walter Schroyens. (2005). Perception of Phonemically Ambiguous Spoken Sequences in French. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27). 2 indexed citations

11.

Dieussaert, Kristien & Walter Schroyens. (2005). Issues in Reasoning about Iffy Propositions: The Secondary Inference Model of Revising Conditional Beliefs and Inferences. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27). 2550–2550. 1 indexed citations

12.

Schroyens, Walter. (2005). Knowledge and thought: An introduction to critical thinking, 4th edition. 52(2). 163–164. 4 indexed citations

13.

Schroyens, Walter. (2004). Conceptual muddles: Truth vs. Truthfulness, Logical vs. Psychological Validity, and the non-monotonic vs. defeasible nature of human inferences. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26). 1 indexed citations

14.

Schroyens, Walter, et al.. (2004). Do reasoners assess the necessity and sufficiency of a cause when reasoning with causal sentences. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations

15.

Schroyens, Walter, Walter Schaeken, & Géry d’Ydewalle. (2001). A meta-analytic review of conditional reasoning by model and/or rule: mental models theory revisited. 9 indexed citations

16.

Schaeken, Walter & Walter Schroyens. (2000). The effect of explicit negatives and of different contrast classes on conditional syllogisms. British Journal of Psychology. 91(4). 533–550. 15 indexed citations

17.

Dieussaert, Kristien, Walter Schaeken, Walter Schroyens, & Géry d’Ydewalle. (1999). Strategies for Dealing with Complex Deductive Problems: Combining and Dividing. Psychologica Belgica. 39(4). 215–215. 7 indexed citations

18.

Schaeken, Walter & Walter Schroyens. (1997). RATIONALITY IN REASONING : THE GUIDELINE FOR RESEARCH. 16. 211–216. 1 indexed citations

19.

Schroyens, Walter. (1997). Meta-Propositional Reasoning About the Truth or Falsity of Propositions. Psychologica Belgica. 37(4). 219–219. 9 indexed citations

20.

Schroyens, Walter, Walter Schaeken, & Géry d’Ydewalle. (1996). Meta-Propositional Reasoning with Knight-Knave Problems: The Importance of Being Hypothesized. Psychologica Belgica. 36(3). 145–145. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact