Senne Braem

4.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
72 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Senne Braem is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Senne Braem has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 17 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Senne Braem's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (49 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (17 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (17 papers). Senne Braem is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (49 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (17 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (17 papers). Senne Braem collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Netherlands. Senne Braem's co-authors include Wim Notebaert, Elger Abrahamse, Tobias Egner, Tom Verguts, Wout Duthoo, Marcel Braß, C. Nico Boehler, Jan De Houwer, Matthew J. C. Crump and Daniel H. Weissman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Psychological Bulletin and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Senne Braem

67 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Senne Braem Belgium 23 1.7k 581 387 321 280 72 2.0k
Mike Wendt Germany 18 1.7k 1.0× 635 1.1× 327 0.8× 358 1.1× 336 1.2× 52 2.1k
Baptist Liefooghe Belgium 27 2.1k 1.2× 713 1.2× 356 0.9× 482 1.5× 438 1.6× 71 2.5k
Ben Eppinger Germany 22 1.3k 0.7× 380 0.7× 300 0.8× 217 0.7× 196 0.7× 42 1.7k
Rico Fischer Germany 29 2.0k 1.1× 899 1.5× 343 0.9× 224 0.7× 536 1.9× 86 2.7k
Roland G. Benoit Germany 18 1.6k 1.0× 1.0k 1.7× 236 0.6× 497 1.5× 297 1.1× 28 2.4k
Kerstin Jost Germany 16 1.8k 1.0× 531 0.9× 206 0.5× 443 1.4× 291 1.0× 25 2.1k
Maël Lebreton France 20 1.3k 0.8× 389 0.7× 338 0.9× 145 0.5× 210 0.8× 40 1.9k
Koji Jimura Japan 25 2.1k 1.2× 526 0.9× 257 0.7× 158 0.5× 238 0.8× 64 2.6k
Birgit Stürmer Germany 24 2.3k 1.3× 514 0.9× 210 0.5× 479 1.5× 659 2.4× 53 2.6k
Miriam Gade Germany 19 1.7k 1.0× 614 1.1× 179 0.5× 566 1.8× 196 0.7× 37 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Senne Braem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Senne Braem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Senne Braem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Senne Braem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Senne Braem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Senne Braem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Senne Braem. The network helps show where Senne Braem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Senne Braem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Senne Braem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Senne Braem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Senne Braem. Senne Braem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nozari, Nazbanou, et al.. (2025). Cognitive control is task specific: Further evidence against the idea of domain-general conflict adaptation.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 51(11). 1703–1715. 1 indexed citations
3.
Dreisbach, Gesine, Sebastian Musslick, & Senne Braem. (2024). Flexibility and stability can be both dependent and independent. Nature Reviews Psychology. 3(9). 636–636. 2 indexed citations
4.
Vermeylen, Luc, et al.. (2024). Reinforcement learning of adaptive control strategies. Communications Psychology. 2(1). 8–8. 11 indexed citations
5.
Verguts, Tom, et al.. (2023). Learning where to be flexible: Using environmental cues to regulate cognitive control.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 153(2). 328–338. 4 indexed citations
6.
Vermeylen, Luc, et al.. (2020). Shared Neural Representations of Cognitive Conflict and Negative Affect in the Medial Frontal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 40(45). 8715–8725. 30 indexed citations
7.
Vermeylen, Luc, Elger Abrahamse, Senne Braem, & Davide Rigoni. (2020). The impact of implicit and explicit suggestions that ‘there is nothing to learn’ on implicit sequence learning. Psychological Research. 85(5). 1943–1954. 1 indexed citations
8.
Braem, Senne, et al.. (2019). The instruction-based congruency effect predicts task execution efficiency: Evidence from inter- and intra-individual differences. Memory & Cognition. 47(8). 1582–1591. 6 indexed citations
9.
Braem, Senne, Julie M. Bugg, James R. Schmidt, et al.. (2019). Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 23(9). 769–783. 215 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Braem, Senne, Annabel D. Nijhof, Davide Rigoni, et al.. (2018). Sensory Prediction Errors Are Less Modulated by Global Context in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. 3(8). 667–674. 51 indexed citations
11.
Braem, Senne & Sabrina Trapp. (2017). Humans show a higher preference for stimuli that are predictive relative to those that are predictable. Psychological Research. 83(3). 567–573. 6 indexed citations
12.
Braem, Senne. (2017). Conditioning task switching behavior. Cognition. 166. 272–276. 48 indexed citations
13.
Rigoni, Davide, Senne Braem, Gilles Pourtois, & Marcel Braß. (2016). Fake feedback on pain tolerance impacts proactive versus reactive control strategies. Consciousness and Cognition. 42. 366–373. 6 indexed citations
14.
Braem, Senne, Baptist Liefooghe, Jan De Houwer, Marcel Braß, & Elger Abrahamse. (2016). There are limits to the effects of task instructions: Making the automatic effects of task instructions context-specific takes practice.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 43(3). 394–403. 22 indexed citations
15.
Bundt, Carsten, Elger Abrahamse, Senne Braem, Marcel Braß, & Wim Notebaert. (2016). Reward anticipation modulates primary motor cortex excitability during task preparation. NeuroImage. 142. 483–488. 24 indexed citations
16.
Braem, Senne, et al.. (2015). Keep calm and be patient: The influence of anxiety and time on post-error adaptations. Acta Psychologica. 164. 34–38. 23 indexed citations
17.
Braem, Senne, et al.. (2015). Open your eyes for prediction errors. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 15(2). 374–380. 71 indexed citations
18.
Duthoo, Wout, Elger Abrahamse, Senne Braem, C. Nico Boehler, & Wim Notebaert. (2014). The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: an update. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 1001–1001. 125 indexed citations
19.
Braem, Senne, Jan De Houwer, Massimo Silvetti, et al.. (2014). No pain, no gain: the affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 15(1). 251–261. 67 indexed citations
20.
Braem, Senne, Tom Verguts, & Wim Notebaert. (2011). Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 37(5). 1662–1666. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026