Walter Kendrick

730 citations
11 papers · 246 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Walter Kendrick

10 papers receiving 150 citations

Peers

Walter Kendrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Gender Studies 93
  • Clinical Psychology 117
  • Literature and Literary Theory 62
  • History 44
  • General Psychology 5
Replace Charlotte Hogsett with:
Charlotte Hogsett
Robert J. Corber United States
Claire Kahane United States
Molly Haskell
Ann Ardis United States
Elizabeth Langland United States
Mary Vipond Canada
Yvonne Tasker United Kingdom
Alan Bray Nigeria
Joseph A. Kestner United States
Walter Kendrick relative to Charlotte Hogsett Charlotte Hogsett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charlotte Hogsett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Walter Kendrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Walter Kendrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Walter Kendrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walter Kendrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Walter Kendrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Walter Kendrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Walter Kendrick. The network helps show where Walter Kendrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Walter Kendrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Walter Kendrick Line = papers co-authored together Walter Kendrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1988176
2
Bloomsbury/Freud: The Letters of James and Alix Strachey, 1924-1925
198624
3 197710
4
The Thrill of Fear: 250 Years of Scary Entertainment
19918
5
The Novel-Machine: The Theory and Fiction of Anthony Trollope
19808
6 19797
7 19746
8 19774
9 20192
10
The secret museum : the history of pornography in literature
19871
11 19850

About Walter Kendrick

Walter Kendrick is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (93 citations), Clinical Psychology (117 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (62 citations), History (44 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). Walter Kendrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Vern L. Bullough, James Strachey, Alix Strachey and Perry Meisel. Their work appears in journals such as New Ideas in Psychology, Renaissance Quarterly, ELH, The American Historical Review and Nineteenth-Century Fiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact