W. T. Stacy

737 citations
37 papers · 528 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

W. T. Stacy

37 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

W. T. Stacy
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 223
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 345
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 110
  • Materials Chemistry 206
  • Ceramics and Composites 23
Replace Akihiro Moritani with:
Akihiro Moritani Japan
J. D. Kuptsis United States
A. H. Reader Netherlands
M. Mäenpää United States
M. A. Shahid United Kingdom
John E. Davey United States
M. Baleva Bulgaria
M. H. Read United States
J.C. Oberlin France
Hideo Sunami Japan
W. T. Stacy relative to Akihiro Moritani Japan Akihiro Moritani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Akihiro Moritani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. T. Stacy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. T. Stacy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. T. Stacy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. T. Stacy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. T. Stacy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. T. Stacy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. T. Stacy. The network helps show where W. T. Stacy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. T. Stacy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. T. Stacy Line = papers co-authored together W. T. Stacy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 198544
2 19829
3 19811
4 198024
5 19793
6 197936
7 197950
8 19781
9 197719
10 197713
11 19778
12 197621
13 19758
14 197529
15 19749
16 197428
17 197425
18 197433
19 197311
20 197118

About W. T. Stacy

W. T. Stacy is a scholar working on Ceramics and Composites, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiation and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 37 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (16 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (8 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (7 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (4 papers), Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites (4 papers) and Glass properties and applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (223 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (345 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (110 citations), Materials Chemistry (206 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (23 citations). W. T. Stacy has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include E. K. Broadbent, J. M. Robertson, W. M. van de Wijgert, Y. Tamminga, Anton Köck, G. J. van Gurp, C.J.M. Rooymans, W. Tolksdorf, G. Bartels and J.C. Brice. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Crystal Growth, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of The Electrochemical Society and IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026