W. Den Boer
- Anthropology top 10%
- Archeology top 5%
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- C. E. V. NixonHerbert MusurilloRobert L. WilkenChristine MohrmannMichiel Van Den HoutJ. H. WaszinkA. G. WoodheadOscar Cullmann
- Topics
- Classical Antiquity Studies (14 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (9 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers)
- Cited by
- AnthropologyArcheologyClassics
In The Last Decade
W. Den Boer
27 papers receiving 99 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Anthropology 56
- Archeology 51
- History 34
- Sociology and Political Science 31
- Political Science and International Relations 27
Countries citing papers authored by W. Den Boer
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Den Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Den Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Den Boer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Den Boer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Den Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Den Boer. The network helps show where W. Den Boer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Den Boer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Den Boer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Den Boer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Den Boer. W. Den Boer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synopsis purioris theologiae = Synopsis of a purer theology : Latin text and English translation | 2 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | God's Twofold Love: The Theology of Jacob Arminius (1559-1609) | 13 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Adriaan Koerbagh and the comparative history of concepts-the past and the future | 1 |
| 8 | The Historiography of German Begriffsgeschichte and the Dutch Project of Conceptual History | 4 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Trajan's deification and Hadrian's succession | 1 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About W. Den Boer
W. Den Boer is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics and History, having authored 42 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (14 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (9 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (56 citations), Archeology (51 citations) and Classics (13 citations). Frequent co-authors include C. E. V. Nixon, Herbert Musurillo, Robert L. Wilken, Christine Mohrmann, Michiel Van Den Hout, J. H. Waszink, A. G. Woodhead, Oscar Cullmann, Jeffrey Henderson and Jürgen Scherer. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, History and Theory and Sixteenth Century Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.