Victoria Wise

579 total citations
53 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Victoria Wise is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Victoria Wise has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Accounting, 15 papers in Strategy and Management and 5 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Victoria Wise's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (12 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (9 papers). Victoria Wise is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (12 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (9 papers). Victoria Wise collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Victoria Wise's co-authors include Wen Qu, Simon Farrell, Janice Loftus, Soheila Mirshekary, Peter Carey, Mong Shan Ee, Li Liu, Anisul M. Islam, Colleen Fisher and Bikram Chatterjee and has published in prestigious journals such as Genes & Development, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Victoria Wise

50 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Victoria Wise Australia	11	241	150	65	49	45	53	376
Bent Warming‐Rasmussen Denmark	9	294 1.2×	86 0.6×	82 1.3×	29 0.6×	37 0.8×	19	366
William W. Stammerjohan United States	8	217 0.9×	128 0.9×	106 1.6×	32 0.7×	11 0.2×	24	343
Steven T. Schwartz United States	10	296 1.2×	67 0.4×	134 2.1×	69 1.4×	57 1.3×	44	501
Marcus M. Doxey United States	10	463 1.9×	124 0.8×	99 1.5×	114 2.3×	73 1.6×	27	571
Terence Bu‐Peow Ng Singapore	8	423 1.8×	96 0.6×	152 2.3×	38 0.8×	42 0.9×	10	487
Rick Hayes United States	9	163 0.7×	77 0.5×	69 1.1×	35 0.7×	22 0.5×	17	287
Susana Gago‐Rodríguez Spain	11	101 0.4×	84 0.6×	100 1.5×	25 0.5×	9 0.2×	29	299
Keith G. Stanga United States	8	264 1.1×	151 1.0×	57 0.9×	41 0.8×	41 0.9×	10	391
John D. Neill United States	10	166 0.7×	131 0.9×	28 0.4×	36 0.7×	22 0.5×	26	288
Michal Matějka United States	12	423 1.8×	169 1.1×	137 2.1×	64 1.3×	72 1.6×	33	564

Countries citing papers authored by Victoria Wise

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria Wise's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria Wise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria Wise more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria Wise

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria Wise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria Wise. The network helps show where Victoria Wise may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Victoria Wise

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Victoria Wise. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Victoria Wise based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Victoria Wise. Victoria Wise is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Chatterjee, Bikram, et al.. (2016). An Investigation into the Potential Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in the United States: Implications and Implementation. Australian Accounting Review. 26(1). 45–65. 12 indexed citations

Taylor, Dennis, et al.. (2013). Institutional ownership, audit committee and risk disclosure – Evidence from Australian stock market. Corporate Board role duties and composition. 9(3). 66–81. 8 indexed citations

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2013). Corporate social reporting preferences in a developing country: evidence from Iran. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(1). 50–58. 2 indexed citations

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2012). Post-crisis corporate governance and the Thailand banking sector. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2012). Social reporting in the annual reports of Iranian listed companies. Corporate Ownership and Control. 10(1). 26–33. 7 indexed citations

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2011). Financial structure and policy of Australia's retirement system. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2011). The Role of Financial Education in Retirement Planning. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 22 indexed citations

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2011). Perceptions of corporate boards about standards of corporate governance in Thailand. Genes & Development. 1(1). 43–54. 2 indexed citations

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2010). Ethical conduct in business : a case study analysis using Bangladesh experiences. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations

10.

Wise, Victoria. (2010). Theory and accountability : the case of government consolidated financial reporting. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 6(5). 82–97. 11 indexed citations

11.

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2010). The Relevance of Financial Education for Retirement Savings Behaviour. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 6(1). 631–645. 2 indexed citations

12.

Farrell, Simon, et al.. (2010). Relations between timing, position, and grouping in short-term memory. Memory & Cognition. 39(4). 573–587. 22 indexed citations

13.

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2008). Case studies on corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 15(3). 136–149. 10 indexed citations

14.

Wise, Victoria & Muhammad Ali. (2007). Customer relationship management in banks with special reference to Bangladesh. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 45–57. 8 indexed citations

15.

Wise, Victoria. (2005). Submission to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand recognition and measurement modifications for small and medium sized entitites (SMEs). eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations

16.

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (2005). Financial Reporting Policy in a Dynamic Environment. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 1(2). 1–9. 7 indexed citations

17.

Sciulli, Nick & Victoria Wise. (2004). Public sector market testing for contracting out: some implications for accounting and management. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations

18.

Wise, Victoria. (2004). Government Consolidated Financial Reporting: Harmonisation Issues. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2004. 423–433. 1 indexed citations

19.

Wise, Victoria, et al.. (1988). AAS no. 7 requires disclosure exposure. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 58(11). 30–32. 2 indexed citations

20.

Romano, Claudio, et al.. (1986). Current cost accounting : dead or alive?. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 57(2). 42–71. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact