Verena Geist

528 citations
23 papers · 181 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Verena Geist

21 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers

Verena Geist
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Software 35
  • Management Information Systems 65
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 27
  • Information Systems 66
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 27
Replace Lina Garcés with:
Lina Garcés Brazil
Abel Gómez Spain
Mohamad Gharib Italy
Richard Mordinyi Austria
Jörn Trefke Germany
Aurelijus Morkevičius Lithuania
Oluwasefunmi Arogundade Nigeria
Francisca Santana Robles Mexico
Valentín Moreno Spain
Francis Bordeleau Canada
Verena Geist relative to Lina Garcés Brazil Lina Garcés's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lina Garcés · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Verena Geist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Verena Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Verena Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Verena Geist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Verena Geist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Verena Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Verena Geist. The network helps show where Verena Geist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Verena Geist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Verena Geist Line = papers co-authored together Verena Geist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201977
2 202029
3 201410
4 20097
5 20207
6 20167
7 20206
8 20125
9 20164
10 20104
11 20134
12 20164
13
Optional Activities in Process Flows.
20123
14 20213
15 20202
16 20162
17 20232
18 20182
19 20231
20 20121

About Verena Geist

Verena Geist is a scholar working on Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications and Software, having authored 23 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (16 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (11 papers), Software Engineering Research (6 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (4 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (3 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers) and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (35 citations), Management Information Systems (65 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (27 citations), Information Systems (66 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (27 citations). Verena Geist has collaborated with scholars based in Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra Mazak, Manuel Wimmer, Dirk Draheim, Werner Zellinger, Lisa Ehrlinger, Lukas Fischer, Rudolf Ramler, David James Brunner, M. Moser and Mohit Kumar. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Software, IEEE Access, Information Systems, Software Practice and Experience and Business Process Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact