Countries citing papers authored by Klaus‐Dieter Schewe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus‐Dieter Schewe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus‐Dieter Schewe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus‐Dieter Schewe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus‐Dieter Schewe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus‐Dieter Schewe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus‐Dieter Schewe. The network helps show where Klaus‐Dieter Schewe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klaus‐Dieter Schewe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klaus‐Dieter Schewe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klaus‐Dieter Schewe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Klaus‐Dieter Schewe. Klaus‐Dieter Schewe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thalheim, Bernhard, et al.. (2014). Conceptual modelling of collaboration for information systems. 260. 272–305.2 indexed citations
2.
Ma, Hui, et al.. (2013). Using formal concept analysis for ontology maintenance in human resource recruitment. 61–68.7 indexed citations
3.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter, et al.. (2011). Challenges in Cloud Computing. Scalable Computing Practice and Experience. 12(4). 385–390.8 indexed citations
Kirchberg, Markus, et al.. (2006). Using reflection for querying XML documents. Australasian Database Conference. 119–128.2 indexed citations
7.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter & Bernhard Thalheim. (2006). Component-driven engineering of database applications. 105–114.4 indexed citations
8.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter, et al.. (2005). Fixed-Point Quantifiers in Higher Order Logics. European Journal of Combinatorics. 237–244.1 indexed citations
9.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter, et al.. (2005). Balancing redundancy and query costs in distributed data warehouses. 97–105.2 indexed citations
10.
Ma, Hui & Klaus‐Dieter Schewe. (2005). Query Optimisation as Part of Distribution Design for Complex Value Databases. European Journal of Combinatorics. 289–296.2 indexed citations
11.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter. (2005). The Challenges in Web Information Systems Development in 15 Pictures (Invited Talk).. 204–215.2 indexed citations
12.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter, et al.. (2004). Context-aware Web Information Systems. 37–48.11 indexed citations
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter, et al.. (2000). Hybrid concurrency control and recovery for multi-level transactions. Acta Cybernetica. 14(3). 419–453.4 indexed citations
18.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter. (1999). The Type Concept in OODB Modelling and its Logical Implications.. European Journal of Combinatorics. 256–274.4 indexed citations
19.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter & Bernhard Thalheim. (1998). Limitations of rule triggering systems for integrity maintenance in the context of transition specifications. Acta Cybernetica. 13(3). 277–304.11 indexed citations
20.
Schewe, Klaus‐Dieter & Bernhard Thalheim. (1993). Fundamental Concepts of Object Oriented Databases.. Acta Cybernetica. 11. 49–83.45 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.