Van den Berghe
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- La Pierre
- Topics
- European and International Law Studies (1 paper)European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (1 paper)European Union Policy and Governance (1 paper)
- Journals
- Social Science QuarterlyInternational Social Science JournalMedical Entomology and Zoology
- Partner nations
- Luxembourg
In The Last Decade
Van den Berghe
10 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Sociology and Political Science 323
- Political Science and International Relations 95
- Social Psychology 70
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
- Demography 65
Countries citing papers authored by Van den Berghe
This map shows the geographic impact of Van den Berghe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Van den Berghe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Van den Berghe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Van den Berghe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Van den Berghe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Van den Berghe. The network helps show where Van den Berghe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Van den Berghe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Van den Berghe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Van den Berghe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Van den Berghe. Van den Berghe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The European Union and the Protection of Minorities: How Real is the Alleged Double Standard? | 2 |
| 2 | Stranger in Their Midst | 4 |
| 3 | The ethnic phenomenon | 354 |
| 4 | The Liberal dilemma in South Africa | 11 |
| 5 | Sociobiology: A New Paradigm for the Behavioral Sciences?. | 0 |
| 6 | Sociobiology, Dogma, and Ethics. | 1 |
| 7 | Man in Society: A Biosocial View | 35 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Age and Sex in Human Societies A Biosocial Perspective | 23 |
| 10 | Ethnicity: The African Experience | 8 |
| 11 | Race and Ethnicity: Essays in Comparative Sociology | 19 |
| 12 | The Role of the Army in Contemporary Africa | 1 |
| 13 | Caneville: The Social Structure of a South African Town | 7 |
About Van den Berghe
Van den Berghe is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European and International Law Studies (1 paper), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (1 paper) and European Union Policy and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (323 citations), Demography (65 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations). Van den Berghe has collaborated with scholars based in Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include La Pierre. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science Quarterly, International Social Science Journal and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.