La Pierre
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Van den BergheDavid BruceDahlia Sharon
- Topics
- Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers)Legal Issues in South Africa (1 paper)Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper)
- Journals
- Social Science QuarterlyInternational Social Science JournalMedical Entomology and Zoology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
La Pierre
12 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Sociology and Political Science 321
- Political Science and International Relations 98
- Social Psychology 69
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 68
- Demography 63
Countries citing papers authored by La Pierre
This map shows the geographic impact of La Pierre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by La Pierre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites La Pierre more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by La Pierre
This network shows the impact of papers produced by La Pierre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by La Pierre. The network helps show where La Pierre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of La Pierre
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of La Pierre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of La Pierre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with La Pierre. La Pierre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raising a New First Amendment Hurdle for Campaign Finance “Reform” | 1 |
| 2 | Issues of Gender in Spatial Reasoning. | 2 |
| 3 | The St. Louis Plan: Substantial Achievements and Unfulfilled Promises. | 2 |
| 4 | The Political Safeguards of Federalism Redux: Intergovernmental Immunity and the States As Agents of the Nation | 4 |
| 5 | The ethnic phenomenon | 354 |
| 6 | The Liberal dilemma in South Africa | 11 |
| 7 | Sociobiology: A New Paradigm for the Behavioral Sciences?. | 0 |
| 8 | Sociobiology, Dogma, and Ethics. | 1 |
| 9 | Man in Society: A Biosocial View | 35 |
| 10 | Age and Sex in Human Societies A Biosocial Perspective | 23 |
| 11 | Ethnicity: The African Experience | 8 |
| 12 | Race and Ethnicity: Essays in Comparative Sociology | 19 |
| 13 | The Role of the Army in Contemporary Africa | 1 |
| 14 | Caneville: The Social Structure of a South African Town | 7 |
About La Pierre
La Pierre is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (1 paper) and Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (321 citations), Demography (63 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (68 citations). La Pierre has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Van den Berghe, David Bruce and Dahlia Sharon. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science Quarterly, International Social Science Journal and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.