Ute C. Bayer

11 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Ute C. Bayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Applied Psychology 342
  • General Decision Sciences 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 137
  • Social Psychology 197
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 138
Replace X.T. Wang with:
X.T. Wang United States
Lile Jia Singapore
Amy N. Dalton Hong Kong
David B. Centerbar United States
Heather Barry Kappes United States
Tali Kleiman Israel
Théodore Alexopoulos France
Aaron M. Sackett United States
Hugh E. McDonald United States
Steven Sweldens Netherlands
Ute C. Bayer relative to X.T. Wang United States X.T. Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
X.T. Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute C. Bayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute C. Bayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute C. Bayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute C. Bayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute C. Bayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute C. Bayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute C. Bayer. The network helps show where Ute C. Bayer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ute C. Bayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute C. Bayer Line = papers co-authored together Ute C. Bayer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action
1999130
2 2009106
3 200672
4 201165
5 200657
6 201051
7 201445
8 201239
9 200537
10 20187
11
Selbst und Zielstreben
20002
12
[Judgement and clinical significance of Treponema pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) test in syphilis diagnostics].
19761
13
Von der Intention zum Handeln : die Erkenntnisse der Würzburger Schule aus heutiger Sicht
19990
14
Das handelnde Selbst: Symbolische Selbstergänzung als zielgerichtete Selbstentwicklung
20020

About Ute C. Bayer

Ute C. Bayer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (342 citations), General Decision Sciences (114 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (137 citations), Social Psychology (197 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations). Ute C. Bayer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Gollwitzer, Anja Achtziger, Gordon B. Moskowitz, Alexander Jaudas, Anna-Lisa Cohen, Oliver B. Büttner, Frank Wieber, Arnd Florack and Robert A. Wicklund. Their work appears in journals such as Motivation and Emotion, Self and Identity, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Psychological Research and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact