Ulrike Rosenkoetter

1.5k total citations
8 papers, 586 citations indexed

About

Ulrike Rosenkoetter is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Ulrike Rosenkoetter has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 586 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Ulrike Rosenkoetter's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). Ulrike Rosenkoetter is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). Ulrike Rosenkoetter collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Ulrike Rosenkoetter's co-authors include Robyn Tate, Michael Perdices, Leanne Togher, Skye McDonald, Kali Godbee, Ian D. Cameron, Ilaria Pozzato, Thomas R. Kratochwill, Robert H. Horner and Alan E. Kazdin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Behavior Modification and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Ulrike Rosenkoetter

8 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ulrike Rosenkoetter Australia 6 216 173 146 136 100 8 586
Regina Schultz Australia 9 134 0.6× 169 1.0× 109 0.7× 104 0.8× 81 0.8× 11 466
Agata Krasny‐Pacini France 11 125 0.6× 136 0.8× 335 2.3× 189 1.4× 184 1.8× 29 781
Arend J. de Kloet Netherlands 18 195 0.9× 70 0.4× 322 2.2× 150 1.1× 323 3.2× 42 888
Lucy Knox Australia 13 77 0.4× 82 0.5× 106 0.7× 98 0.7× 227 2.3× 17 520
Christine Chapparo Australia 15 122 0.6× 112 0.6× 288 2.0× 197 1.4× 197 2.0× 73 748
Theresa Powell United Kingdom 16 48 0.2× 108 0.6× 274 1.9× 143 1.1× 210 2.1× 26 682
Dulce María Romero Ayuso Spain 13 115 0.5× 157 0.9× 295 2.0× 149 1.1× 30 0.3× 78 714
Reg C. Morris United Kingdom 17 35 0.2× 139 0.8× 233 1.6× 180 1.3× 238 2.4× 38 799
Adele Proctor United States 13 143 0.7× 170 1.0× 41 0.3× 106 0.8× 77 0.8× 27 480
Phillip J. Bairstow Australia 14 338 1.6× 339 2.0× 165 1.1× 41 0.3× 25 0.3× 33 896

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Rosenkoetter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Rosenkoetter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Rosenkoetter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Rosenkoetter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Rosenkoetter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Rosenkoetter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Rosenkoetter. The network helps show where Ulrike Rosenkoetter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrike Rosenkoetter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrike Rosenkoetter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrike Rosenkoetter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrike Rosenkoetter. Ulrike Rosenkoetter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Tate, Robyn, Michael Perdices, Ulrike Rosenkoetter, et al.. (2019). Reprint of “The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and Elaboration”. Pratiques Psychologiques. 25(2). 119–151. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pozzato, Ilaria, Robyn Tate, Ulrike Rosenkoetter, & Ian D. Cameron. (2019). Epidemiology of hospitalised traumatic brain injury in the state of New South Wales, Australia: a population‐based study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 43(4). 382–388. 61 indexed citations
3.
Perdices, Michael, Robyn Tate, & Ulrike Rosenkoetter. (2019). An Algorithm to Evaluate Methodological Rigor and Risk of Bias in Single-Case Studies. Behavior Modification. 47(6). 1482–1509. 22 indexed citations
5.
Rosenkoetter, Ulrike & Robyn Tate. (2017). Assessing Features of Psychometric Assessment Instruments: A Comparison of the COSMIN Checklist with Other Critical Appraisal Tools. Brain Impairment. 19(1). 103–118. 33 indexed citations
6.
Tate, Robyn, Michael Perdices, Ulrike Rosenkoetter, et al.. (2016). The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). 10–31. 145 indexed citations
7.
Tate, Robyn, Michael Perdices, Skye McDonald, Leanne Togher, & Ulrike Rosenkoetter. (2014). The design, conduct and report of single-case research: Resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 24(3-4). 315–331. 67 indexed citations
8.
Tate, Robyn, Michael Perdices, Ulrike Rosenkoetter, et al.. (2013). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs andn-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias inN-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 23(5). 619–638. 254 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026