Ulf Steinberg

429 total citations
20 papers, 205 citations indexed

About

Ulf Steinberg is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Ulf Steinberg has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 205 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pharmacology, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Ulf Steinberg's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (5 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (3 papers). Ulf Steinberg is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (5 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (3 papers). Ulf Steinberg collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Ulf Steinberg's co-authors include André Klußmann, Falk Liebers, Mario Gollwitzer, Andrea E. Abele, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Hansjürgen Gebhardt, Monika A. Rieger, Ute Latza, D Greschuchna and Brigitte Röder and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Neuroscience, BMJ Open and BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Ulf Steinberg

19 papers receiving 196 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ulf Steinberg Germany 9 76 70 39 31 31 20 205
Maria Luiza Caíres Comper Brazil 10 185 2.4× 108 1.5× 77 2.0× 70 2.3× 6 0.2× 19 330
George V. Kissel United States 5 121 1.6× 165 2.4× 27 0.7× 32 1.0× 8 301
Robert A. North United States 10 13 0.2× 119 1.7× 21 0.5× 9 0.3× 7 0.2× 34 318
Barbara G.F. Cohen United States 7 125 1.6× 270 3.9× 38 1.0× 59 1.9× 2 0.1× 15 390
D. Daniel India 6 50 0.7× 91 1.3× 12 0.3× 34 1.1× 13 239
Terry E. McSween United States 8 6 0.1× 95 1.4× 162 4.2× 16 0.5× 75 2.4× 15 325
Carl Graf Hoyos Germany 8 8 0.1× 104 1.5× 68 1.7× 22 0.7× 38 1.2× 24 226
Marla C. Haims United States 6 218 2.9× 154 2.2× 132 3.4× 107 3.5× 7 0.2× 13 411
Clint Pinion United States 4 185 2.4× 106 1.5× 66 1.7× 54 1.7× 27 0.9× 7 296
Narmin Hassanzadeh‐Rangi Iran 11 18 0.2× 107 1.5× 333 8.5× 25 0.8× 213 6.9× 25 454

Countries citing papers authored by Ulf Steinberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulf Steinberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulf Steinberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulf Steinberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulf Steinberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulf Steinberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulf Steinberg. The network helps show where Ulf Steinberg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulf Steinberg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulf Steinberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulf Steinberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulf Steinberg. Ulf Steinberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Steinberg, Ulf, et al.. (2025). Combining Moral Foundations and Justice Sensitivity Perspectives to Understand Political Orientation. Social Psychology. 56(3). 122–139. 1 indexed citations
2.
Straatmann, Tammo, et al.. (2023). Mobilizing Professors’ Support of Digital Change: Multi-Level Insights on IT Resources as a Boundary Condition. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 60(3). 389–428. 5 indexed citations
3.
Steinberg, Ulf, et al.. (2021). Perspective-Specific Moral Foundations Sensitivity and Political Orientation. Psychology Archives. 1 indexed citations
4.
Gollwitzer, Mario, Andrea E. Abele, Christian J. Fiebach, et al.. (2021). Management und Bereitstellung von Forschungsdaten in der Psychologie: Überarbeitung der DGPs-Empfehlungen. Psychologische Rundschau. 72(2). 132–146. 8 indexed citations
5.
Abele, Andrea E., Mario Gollwitzer, Ulf Steinberg, & Felix D. Schönbrodt. (2019). Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing. Social Psychology. 50(4). 252–260. 45 indexed citations
6.
Gollwitzer, Mario, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Ulf Steinberg, & Andrea E. Abele. (2018). Die Datenmanagement-Empfehlungen der DGPs: Ein Zwischenstand. Psychologische Rundschau. 69(4). 366–373. 4 indexed citations
7.
Steinberg, Ulf, Andrea E. Abele, Mario Gollwitzer, & Felix D. Schönbrodt. (2018). Attitudes towards DGPs Data Management Recommendations and Public Data Sharing. Psychology Archives. 2 indexed citations
8.
Klußmann, André, Falk Liebers, Marianne Schust, et al.. (2017). Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 7(8). e015412–e015412. 10 indexed citations
10.
Ley, Pia, Ulf Steinberg, Ileana L. Hanganu‐Opatz, & Brigitte Röder. (2015). Event‐related potential evidence for a dynamic (re‐)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual–tactile interactions. European Journal of Neuroscience. 41(11). 1466–1474. 7 indexed citations
11.
Klußmann, André, Hansjürgen Gebhardt, Monika A. Rieger, Falk Liebers, & Ulf Steinberg. (2012). Evaluation of objectivity, reliability and criterion validity of the Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO), draft 2007. Work. 41(S1). 3997–4003. 13 indexed citations
13.
Klußmann, André, Ulf Steinberg, Falk Liebers, Hansjürgen Gebhardt, & Monika A. Rieger. (2010). The Key Indicator Method for Manual Handling Operations (KIM-MHO) - evaluation of a new method for the assessment of working conditions within a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 11(1). 272–272. 30 indexed citations
14.
Schaub, Karlheinz, et al.. (2010). Das Multiple-Lasten-Tool: integrierte Bewertung unterschiedlicher Arten manueller Lastenhandhabung. 3 indexed citations
15.
Klußmann, André, et al.. (2009). Assessment of salivary cortisol as stress marker in ambulance service personnel: comparison between shifts working on mobile intensive care unit and patient transport ambulance. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 82(9). 1057–1064. 17 indexed citations
16.
Steinberg, Ulf, et al.. (2008). Key Indicator Method Manual Handling Operations. 4 indexed citations
17.
Klußmann, André, et al.. (2005). Gestaltung gesundheitsförderlicher Arbeitsbedingungen für Rettungsdienstpersonal. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin. 8(8). 564–568. 4 indexed citations
18.
Wagner, William E., et al.. (1987). [Physiologic reactions to bimanual labor and additional use of manipulators].. PubMed. 33(4). 203–5. 1 indexed citations
19.
Petro, W, et al.. (1982). Regional and Global Lung Function in Unilateral Fibrothorax after Conservative Therapy and Decortication. The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. 30(3). 137–141. 10 indexed citations
20.
Steinberg, Ulf. (1957). [Complications of laparoscopy. II. Incidents caused by liver puncture].. PubMed. 12(5). 201–6. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026