William E. Wagner

5.1k total citations
106 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

William E. Wagner is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, William E. Wagner has authored 106 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 27 papers in Genetics and 12 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in William E. Wagner's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (45 papers), Plant and animal studies (32 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (26 papers). William E. Wagner is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (45 papers), Plant and animal studies (32 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (26 papers). William E. Wagner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. William E. Wagner's co-authors include Michael J. Ryan, W. Wyatt Hoback, Christopher Harper, Alexandra L. Basolo, Brian K. Sullivan, Brian Joseph Gillespie, Oliver M. Beckers, Erin Ruel, Anne-Marie Murray and William H. Cade and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Clinical Investigation and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

William E. Wagner

102 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William E. Wagner United States 30 2.6k 1.1k 848 648 325 106 3.8k
Govindasamy Agoramoorthy Taiwan 27 345 0.1× 240 0.2× 216 0.3× 202 0.3× 391 1.2× 175 3.2k
J. B. S. Haldane United Kingdom 28 995 0.4× 2.1k 1.9× 153 0.2× 26 0.0× 533 1.6× 93 4.0k
J. Hutchinson Germany 26 2.0k 0.8× 260 0.2× 216 0.3× 160 0.2× 767 2.4× 86 3.8k
Herbert Friedmann United States 26 605 0.2× 286 0.3× 177 0.2× 94 0.1× 979 3.0× 111 2.9k
Mark Broom United Kingdom 30 945 0.4× 1.1k 0.9× 357 0.4× 76 0.1× 493 1.5× 160 3.1k
Norio Yamamura Japan 31 1.3k 0.5× 960 0.9× 288 0.3× 34 0.1× 700 2.2× 109 3.2k
George F. Estabrook United States 32 1.2k 0.4× 830 0.7× 191 0.2× 56 0.1× 534 1.6× 95 3.1k
Megan L. Head Australia 27 1.5k 0.6× 715 0.6× 378 0.4× 64 0.1× 581 1.8× 100 3.0k
Charles W. Myers United States 31 1.0k 0.4× 804 0.7× 2.1k 2.5× 51 0.1× 347 1.1× 109 3.4k
Thomas B. Ryder United States 37 992 0.4× 1.1k 0.9× 246 0.3× 166 0.3× 1.5k 4.6× 94 4.9k

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Wagner. The network helps show where William E. Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Wagner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Wagner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Wagner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Wagner. William E. Wagner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wagner, William E., et al.. (2017). Females can solve the problem of low signal reliability by assessing multiple male traits. Biology Letters. 13(9). 20170386–20170386. 1 indexed citations
2.
Wagner, William E., et al.. (2016). Males Can Benefit from Sexual Cannibalism Facilitated by Self-Sacrifice. Current Biology. 26(20). 2794–2799. 25 indexed citations
3.
Beckers, Oliver M. & William E. Wagner. (2013). Parasitoid infestation changes female mating preferences. Animal Behaviour. 85(4). 791–796. 13 indexed citations
4.
Beckers, Oliver M. & William E. Wagner. (2012). Eavesdropping parasitoids do not cause the evolution of less conspicuous signalling behaviour in a field cricket. Animal Behaviour. 84(6). 1457–1462. 10 indexed citations
5.
Wagner, William E., et al.. (2010). Female Field Crickets Incur Increased Parasitism Risk When Near Preferred Song. PLoS ONE. 5(3). e9592–e9592. 20 indexed citations
6.
Basolo, Alexandra L. & William E. Wagner. (2006). Genetic Variation in Maternal Investment Patterns in Platyfish Xiphophorus maculatus. Zebrafish. 3(3). 339–345. 2 indexed citations
7.
Wagner, William E.. (2005). Male field crickets that provide reproductive benefits to females incur higher costs. Ecological Entomology. 30(3). 350–357. 21 indexed citations
8.
Wagner, William E., Matthew R. Smeds, & Daniel D. Wiegmann. (2001). Experience Affects Female Responses to Male Song in the Variable Field Cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ethology. 107(9). 769–776. 79 indexed citations
9.
Enghardt, W., Frank Gabriel, P. Gippner, et al.. (1999). The ELBE Radiation Source Project. Acta Physica Polonica B. 30. 1639. 2 indexed citations
10.
Thakker, Kamlesh M., et al.. (1992). Effect of food and relative bioavailability following single doses of diclofenac 150mg hydrogel bead (HGB) capsules in healthy humans. Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition. 13(5). 327–335. 11 indexed citations
11.
Rakhit, Ashok, Srikumaran Melethil, John D. Arnold, & William E. Wagner. (1987). Kinetics of Potassium Excretion Following Oral Supplements: Evidence of Induced Natriuresis. Pharmaceutical Research. 4(6). 531–535. 9 indexed citations
12.
Wagner, William E.. (1986). Tadpoles and Pollen: Observations on the Feeding Behavior of Hyla regilla Larvae. Copeia. 1986(3). 802–802. 14 indexed citations
13.
Wagner, William E., et al.. (1981). Aminoglutethimide Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, and Binding to Blood Constituents. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 70(9). 1040–1043. 15 indexed citations
14.
Alkalay, David, et al.. (1981). Quantitation Of The Local Anesthetic Dibucaine With Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Letters. 14(20). 1745–1756. 5 indexed citations
15.
Gary, Dale E., G. A. Dulk, William E. Wagner, et al.. (1980). Visible Light and Radio Observations of the First Coronal Transient Event of 1980 June 29. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 12. 904. 1 indexed citations
16.
Wagner, William E.. (1979). Oscillator design by device line measurement. MiJo. 22. 43–45. 17 indexed citations
17.
Wagner, William E. & F. K. Manasse. (1975). Simplify high-power Gunn oscillator design. 14. 43–45.
18.
Bartlett, M. F., et al.. (1974). Disposition of Hydralazine in Man and a Specific Method for Its Determination in Biological Fluids. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 63(2). 225–229. 34 indexed citations
19.
Horton, Frank E. & William E. Wagner. (1969). A MARKOVIAN ANALYSIS OF URBAN TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: PATTERN RESPONSE BY SOCIOECONOMIC-OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS. Highway Research Record. 12 indexed citations
20.
Corcoran, A. C., William E. Wagner, & Irvine H. Page. (1956). RENAL PARTICIPATION IN ENHANCED PRESSOR RESPONSES TO NORADRENALINE IN PATIENTS GIVEN HEXAMETHONIUM. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 35(8). 868–873. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026