U. Neuner

1.1k total citations
17 papers, 228 citations indexed

About

U. Neuner is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, U. Neuner has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 228 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 6 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 5 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in U. Neuner's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4 papers). U. Neuner is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4 papers). U. Neuner collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Spain. U. Neuner's co-authors include D. H. H. Hoffmann, A. Tauschwitz, R. Bock, J. A. Maruhn, A. Kozyreva, N. A. Tahir, P. Spiller, A. Shutov, M. Roth and R. Redmer and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Nuclear Fusion and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

In The Last Decade

U. Neuner

15 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
U. Neuner Germany	6	178	81	58	52	51	17	228
A. Kozyreva Germany	10	292 1.6×	176 2.2×	105 1.8×	74 1.4×	110 2.2×	18	379
F. J. Wysocki United States	9	195 1.1×	62 0.8×	25 0.4×	24 0.5×	56 1.1×	25	219
U. Neuner Germany	11	261 1.5×	103 1.3×	75 1.3×	65 1.3×	149 2.9×	39	346
Samuel Brockington United States	9	222 1.2×	33 0.4×	34 0.6×	53 1.0×	54 1.1×	26	282
D. E. Hebron United States	9	195 1.1×	51 0.6×	37 0.6×	43 0.8×	90 1.8×	16	250
M. Rodríguez-Ramos Spain	11	208 1.2×	20 0.2×	40 0.7×	67 1.3×	50 1.0×	32	313
А. В. Канцырев Russia	8	181 1.0×	60 0.7×	29 0.5×	18 0.3×	64 1.3×	35	250
A. Tauschwitz Germany	6	142 0.8×	42 0.5×	35 0.6×	49 0.9×	92 1.8×	18	223
P. W. Lake United States	10	179 1.0×	47 0.6×	36 0.6×	23 0.4×	145 2.8×	30	318
V. I. Turtikov Russia	10	140 0.8×	47 0.6×	37 0.6×	31 0.6×	95 1.9×	26	228

Countries citing papers authored by U. Neuner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Neuner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Neuner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Neuner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Neuner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Neuner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Neuner. The network helps show where U. Neuner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Neuner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Neuner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Neuner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Neuner. U. Neuner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Dinklage, A., J. Geiger, M. Hirsch, et al.. (2022). Fast characterization of plasma states in W7-X with permutation entropy. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 64(8). 84005–84005. 1 indexed citations

Dinklage, A., G. Fuchert, R. C. Wolf, et al.. (2021). Validation of theory-based models for the control of plasma currents in W7-X divertor plasmas. Nuclear Fusion. 61(12). 126022–126022. 3 indexed citations

Knieps, A., Y. Suzuki, J. Geiger, et al.. (2021). Plasma beta effects on the edge magnetic field structure and divertor heat loads in Wendelstein 7-X high-performance scenarios. Nuclear Fusion. 62(2). 26011–26011. 7 indexed citations

Dinklage, A., G. Fuchert, R. C. Wolf, et al.. (2020). Theory-based Models for the Control of W7-X Divertor Plasmas.

Rahbarnia, K., T. Andreeva, T. Bluhm, et al.. (2019). MHD activity during the recent divertor campaign at the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 1 indexed citations

Andreeva, T., A. Alonso, S. Bozhenkov, et al.. (2019). Equilibrium evaluation for Wendelstein 7-X experiment programs in the first divertor phase. Fusion Engineering and Design. 146. 299–302. 5 indexed citations

Gao, Yu, M. Jakubowski, J. Geiger, et al.. (2018). Effects of toroidal plasma currents on the strike-line movements on W7-X. Max Planck Digital Library. 1 indexed citations

Rahbarnia, K., H. Thomsen, U. Neuner, et al.. (2018). Diamagnetic energy measurement during the first operational phase at the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator. Nuclear Fusion. 58(9). 96010–96010. 26 indexed citations

Rahbarnia, K., T. Andreeva, A. Cardella, et al.. (2016). Commissioning of the magnetic diagnostics during the first operation phase at Wendelstein 7-X. Max Planck Digital Library. 2 indexed citations

10.

Thomsen, H., T. Andreeva, C. Brandt, et al.. (2016). Status and prospects of the MHD diagnostics at Wendelstein 7-X stellarator. Max Planck Digital Library. 1 indexed citations

11.

Neuner, U., A. Cardella, M. Endler, et al.. (2011). Preparing diagnostics for long pulse operation at W7-X. Fusion Engineering and Design. 87(5-6). 392–394.

12.

Neuner, U., R. Bock, Carmen Constantin, et al.. (2001). Experiments using the high current upgrade of the GSI accelerators: response of converters to heating by intense heavy ion beams. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 464(1-3). 326–330. 6 indexed citations

13.

Tahir, N. A., D. H. H. Hoffmann, A. Kozyreva, et al.. (2000). Shock compression of condensed matter using intense beams of energetic heavy ions. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 61(2). 1975–1980. 72 indexed citations

14.

Tahir, N. A., D. H. H. Hoffmann, A. Kozyreva, et al.. (2000). Metallization of hydrogen using heavy-ion-beam implosion of multilayered cylindrical targets. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 63(1). 16402–16402. 91 indexed citations

15.

Ogawa, Makoto, U. Neuner, A. Sakumi, et al.. (1999). Heavy ion beam inertial confinement fusion studies in TIT. Fusion Engineering and Design. 44(1-4). 279–283. 3 indexed citations

16.

Spiller, P., M. Stetter, Sally Stowe, et al.. (1996). Final beam transport and the application of high current pulsed quadrupole lenses for focusing in an inertial confinement fusion test facility. Fusion Engineering and Design. 32-33. 391–394. 1 indexed citations

17.

Tauschwitz, A., E. Boggasch, D. H. H. Hoffmann, et al.. (1993). The plasma lens solution for heavy-ion beam focusing. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 106(11). 1733–1737. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact