C. D. Beidler

5.1k total citations
91 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

C. D. Beidler is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, C. D. Beidler has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 74 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 44 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 24 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in C. D. Beidler's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (74 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (35 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (27 papers). C. D. Beidler is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (74 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (35 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (27 papers). C. D. Beidler collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Japan and United States. C. D. Beidler's co-authors include H. Maaßberg, N. B. Marushchenko, S. Murakami, J. Geiger, Y. Turkin, V. Tribaldos, Y. Turkin, A. Dinklage, P. Helander and Y. Feng and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Computational Physics.

In The Last Decade

C. D. Beidler

85 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. D. Beidler Germany 26 1.9k 983 647 483 450 91 2.0k
A. Bortolon United States 27 1.9k 1.0× 1.1k 1.1× 785 1.2× 445 0.9× 411 0.9× 113 2.0k
I.T. Chapman United Kingdom 28 2.0k 1.1× 1.3k 1.3× 599 0.9× 447 0.9× 552 1.2× 70 2.1k
B. LeBlanc United States 28 2.1k 1.1× 1.2k 1.2× 692 1.1× 523 1.1× 491 1.1× 95 2.2k
C. Challis United Kingdom 24 1.8k 1.0× 896 0.9× 855 1.3× 333 0.7× 532 1.2× 94 1.9k
R. Scannell United Kingdom 25 1.7k 0.9× 950 1.0× 564 0.9× 360 0.7× 431 1.0× 94 1.8k
C. T. Holcomb United States 24 1.9k 1.0× 976 1.0× 625 1.0× 452 0.9× 517 1.1× 88 2.0k
T. Lunt Germany 25 1.9k 1.0× 733 0.7× 1.1k 1.7× 433 0.9× 581 1.3× 111 2.0k
J. Kißlinger Germany 22 1.6k 0.9× 644 0.7× 834 1.3× 367 0.8× 546 1.2× 108 1.7k
K. Tritz United States 25 1.9k 1.0× 1.0k 1.1× 635 1.0× 433 0.9× 458 1.0× 102 2.1k
E. A. Belli United States 25 2.1k 1.1× 1.1k 1.1× 820 1.3× 511 1.1× 541 1.2× 87 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by C. D. Beidler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. D. Beidler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. D. Beidler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. D. Beidler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. D. Beidler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. D. Beidler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. D. Beidler. The network helps show where C. D. Beidler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. D. Beidler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. D. Beidler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. D. Beidler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. D. Beidler. C. D. Beidler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Albert, Christopher G., et al.. (2025). On the convergence of bootstrap current to the Shaing–Callen limit in stellarators. Journal of Plasma Physics. 91(3).
2.
Jorge, R., et al.. (2025). Electron root optimisation for stellarator reactor designs. Journal of Plasma Physics. 91(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Lazerson, S., et al.. (2024). Direct optimization of neoclassical ion transport in stellarator reactors. Nuclear Fusion. 64(10). 106054–106054. 2 indexed citations
4.
Feng, Y., V. Winters, D. Zhang, et al.. (2024). Conditions and benefits of X-point radiation for the island divertor. Nuclear Fusion. 64(8). 86027–86027. 6 indexed citations
5.
Beidler, C. D., M. Drevlak, J. Geiger, et al.. (2024). Reduction of neoclassical bulk-ion transport to avoid helium-ash retention in stellarator reactors. Nuclear Fusion. 64(12). 126030–126030. 7 indexed citations
6.
Goodman, A., P. Xanthopoulos, G. G. Plunk, et al.. (2024). Quasi-Isodynamic Stellarators with Low Turbulence as Fusion Reactor Candidates. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 16 indexed citations
7.
Helander, P., et al.. (2024). Optimised stellarators with a positive radial electric field. Journal of Plasma Physics. 90(6). 2 indexed citations
8.
Kleiber, R., H. M. Smith, P. Helander, et al.. (2024). Assessment of validity of local neoclassical transport theory for studies of electric-field root-transitions in the W7-X stellarator. Nuclear Fusion. 65(1). 16019–16019. 1 indexed citations
9.
Goodman, A., S. Henneberg, R. Jorge, et al.. (2023). Constructing precisely quasi-isodynamic magnetic fields. Journal of Plasma Physics. 89(5). 34 indexed citations
10.
Panadero, N., F. Koechl, A.R. Polevoi, et al.. (2023). A comparison of the influence of plasmoid-drift mechanisms on plasma fuelling by cryogenic pellets in ITER and Wendelstein 7-X. Nuclear Fusion. 63(4). 46022–46022. 7 indexed citations
11.
Dinklage, A., G. Fuchert, R. C. Wolf, et al.. (2021). Validation of theory-based models for the control of plasma currents in W7-X divertor plasmas. Nuclear Fusion. 61(12). 126022–126022. 3 indexed citations
12.
Warmer, F., et al.. (2021). A general stellarator version of the systems code PROCESS. Nuclear Fusion. 61(12). 126021–126021. 12 indexed citations
13.
Xanthopoulos, P., S. Bozhenkov, M. Beurskens, et al.. (2020). Turbulence Mechanisms of Enhanced Performance Stellarator Plasmas. Physical Review Letters. 125(7). 75001–75001. 31 indexed citations
14.
Gogoleva, A., V. Tribaldos, J.M. Reynolds-Barredo, & C. D. Beidler. (2020). Statistical description of collisionlessα-particle transport in cases of broken symmetry: from ITER to quasi-toroidally symmetric stellarators. Nuclear Fusion. 60(5). 56009–56009. 2 indexed citations
15.
Beidler, C. D., Y. Feng, J. Geiger, et al.. (2018). (Expected difficulties with) density-profile control in W7-X high-performance plasmas. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 60(10). 105008–105008. 10 indexed citations
16.
Drevlak, M., C. D. Beidler, J. Geiger, P. Helander, & Y. Turkin. (2018). Optimisation of stellarator equilibria with ROSE. Nuclear Fusion. 59(1). 16010–16010. 45 indexed citations
17.
Alonso, A., C. D. Beidler, S. Bozhenkov, et al.. (2017). Ion heat transport in low-density Wendelstein 7-X plasmas. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 1 indexed citations
18.
Drevlak, M., C. D. Beidler, J. Geiger, P. Helander, & Y. Turkin. (2014). Quasi-isodynamic Configuration with Improved Confinement. Max Planck Digital Library. 2 indexed citations
19.
Beidler, C. D., et al.. (2001). Stochastic diffusion of energetic ions in optimized stellarators. Physics of Plasmas. 8(6). 2731–2738. 36 indexed citations
20.
Kißlinger, J., B.E. Keen, C. D. Beidler, et al.. (1991). Magnetic Field and Coil Systems of the Modular Helias Configurations HS 5-10. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 1520–1524. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026