U. Krainick‐Strobel

426 total citations
19 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

U. Krainick‐Strobel is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, U. Krainick‐Strobel has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 9 papers in Cancer Research and 5 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in U. Krainick‐Strobel's work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (10 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (5 papers). U. Krainick‐Strobel is often cited by papers focused on Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (10 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (5 papers). U. Krainick‐Strobel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Estonia. U. Krainick‐Strobel's co-authors include D. Wallwiener, K Siegmann, T Xydeas, Claus D. Claussen, Ralph Sinkus, Stephan Miller, Markus Hahn, Stefan Paepke, Augustinus H. Tulusan and G. Bastert and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Cancer, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

In The Last Decade

U. Krainick‐Strobel

19 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
U. Krainick‐Strobel Germany 10 170 153 117 80 70 19 332
Claudio Ferranti Italy 9 131 0.8× 157 1.0× 185 1.6× 65 0.8× 34 0.5× 26 368
Anita G. Bourke Australia 13 175 1.0× 236 1.5× 118 1.0× 56 0.7× 100 1.4× 32 417
J.S. Walsh United Kingdom 7 210 1.2× 210 1.4× 100 0.9× 135 1.7× 58 0.8× 8 398
Katherine Gonzalez United States 12 169 1.0× 184 1.2× 62 0.5× 59 0.7× 89 1.3× 23 345
Miwa Yoshida Japan 11 150 0.9× 142 0.9× 158 1.4× 106 1.3× 35 0.5× 26 354
Mari Kikuchi Japan 12 82 0.5× 120 0.8× 134 1.1× 75 0.9× 26 0.4× 37 327
Tanya W. Moseley United States 9 239 1.4× 185 1.2× 105 0.9× 112 1.4× 77 1.1× 37 373
Lauren Friedlander United States 7 183 1.1× 167 1.1× 128 1.1× 40 0.5× 54 0.8× 10 306
Enis Öztürk Türkiye 5 121 0.7× 165 1.1× 136 1.2× 49 0.6× 46 0.7× 8 301
Taube H. Samuels Canada 5 115 0.7× 179 1.2× 169 1.4× 92 1.1× 31 0.4× 7 400

Countries citing papers authored by U. Krainick‐Strobel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Krainick‐Strobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Krainick‐Strobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Krainick‐Strobel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Krainick‐Strobel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Krainick‐Strobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Krainick‐Strobel. The network helps show where U. Krainick‐Strobel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Krainick‐Strobel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Krainick‐Strobel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Krainick‐Strobel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Krainick‐Strobel. U. Krainick‐Strobel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Hahn, Markus, U. Krainick‐Strobel, Stefan Kluge, et al.. (2012). Interdisciplinary Consensus Recommendations for the use of Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy under Sonographic Guidance: First update 2012. Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. 33(4). 366–371. 42 indexed citations
2.
Hahn, Markus, U. Krainick‐Strobel, B. Krämer, et al.. (2010). Dignitätskriterien der Mammasonografie unter Anwendung des Real-Time Compound Image in Kombination mit dem XRES Adaptiv Image Processing. Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. 33(3). 270–274. 10 indexed citations
3.
Hahn, Markus, Karl Oliver Kagan, K Siegmann, et al.. (2009). Mammotome® versus ATEC®: a comparison of two breast vacuum biopsy techniques under sonographic guidance. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 281(2). 287–292. 6 indexed citations
4.
Hahn, Markus, Rohini Kuner, Klaus Freidel, et al.. (2009). Sonographic Criteria for the Confirmation of Implant Rotation and the Development of an Implant-Capsule-Interaction (“Interface”) in Anatomically Formed Textured Breast Implants with Texturised Biocell®-Surface. Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie. 6(1). 48–53. 1 indexed citations
5.
6.
Hahn, Markus, Klaus Freidel, G. M. Hoffmann, et al.. (2008). Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A comparison of 11-gauge and 8-gauge needles in benign breast disease. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 6(1). 51–51. 27 indexed citations
7.
Kraemer, Bernhard, et al.. (2007). Cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast: a rare diagnosis: case studies and review of literature. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 276(6). 649–653. 17 indexed citations
8.
Hahn, Markus, Rohini Kuner, Klaus Freidel, et al.. (2007). Sonographic Criteria for the Confirmation of Implant Rotation and the Development of an Implant-Capsule-Interaction (”Interface”) in Anatomically Formed Textured Breast Implants with Texturised Biocell®-Surface. Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. 29(4). 399–404. 15 indexed citations
9.
Krainick‐Strobel, U., Anke Bergmann, Christian Gall, et al.. (2006). Complete extirpation of benign breast lesions with an ultrasound‐guided vacuum biopsy system. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 29(3). 342–346. 25 indexed citations
10.
Krainick‐Strobel, U., Christian Gall, Bernhard Krämer, et al.. (2006). Development of a gel-simulation model and generation of standard tables for the complete extirpation of benign breast lesions with vacuum assisted biopsy under ultrasound guidance. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 32(10). 1539–1544. 5 indexed citations
11.
Krainick‐Strobel, U., Markus Hahn, Volker Duda, et al.. (2006). Consensus recommendations for the use of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under sonographic guidance. Gynecological Surgery. 3(4). 309–314. 2 indexed citations
12.
Krainick‐Strobel, U., B. Krämer, E. Kaiserling, et al.. (2006). Massive cavernous lymphangioma of the breast and thoracic wall: case report and literature review.. PubMed. 39(3). 147–51. 9 indexed citations
13.
Siegmann, K, T Xydeas, U. Krainick‐Strobel, et al.. (2005). Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Localization of 131 Breast Lesions With Modified Embolization Coils. Investigative Radiology. 40(6). 368–377. 13 indexed citations
14.
Xydeas, T, K Siegmann, Ralph Sinkus, et al.. (2005). Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Breast. Investigative Radiology. 40(7). 412–420. 69 indexed citations
15.
16.
Krainick‐Strobel, U., et al.. (2005). Onkologie. Konsensusempfehlung zu Anwendung und Indikationen der Vakuumbiopsie der Brust unter Ultraschallsicht. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 65(5). 526–529. 3 indexed citations
17.
Krainick‐Strobel, U., Volker Duda, Stefan Paepke, et al.. (2005). Zusammenfassung der Konsensusempfehlung zu Anwendung und Indikationen der Vakuumbiopsie der Brust unter Ultraschallsicht. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie. 127(3). 1 indexed citations
18.
Brucker, Sara Y., J. F. Traub, U. Krainick‐Strobel, et al.. (2005). Brustzentren?Entwicklung in Deutschland. Der Onkologe. 11(3). 285–297. 8 indexed citations
19.
Huober, Jens, U. Krainick‐Strobel, Raffael Kurek, & D. Wallwiener. (2004). Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Primary Breast Cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer. 5(5). 341–347. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Claudio Ferranti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anita G. Bourke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J.S. Walsh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katherine Gonzalez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Miwa Yoshida Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mari Kikuchi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tanya W. Moseley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lauren Friedlander Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Enis Öztürk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Taube H. Samuels
Rankless by CCL
2026