I. Schreer

1.7k total citations
51 papers, 923 citations indexed

About

I. Schreer is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, I. Schreer has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 923 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Cancer Research, 22 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 22 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in I. Schreer's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (27 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (21 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (21 papers). I. Schreer is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (27 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (21 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (21 papers). I. Schreer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. I. Schreer's co-authors include Sylvia H. Heywang‐Köbrunner, Daniela Peter, Susan Barter, Mathew Wallis, Ute Kettritz, Rüdiger Schulz‐Wendtland, Thomas Helbich, Alexander Katalinic, W. Jonat and Fritz Schaefer and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, British Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

I. Schreer

46 papers receiving 871 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I. Schreer Germany 15 505 392 391 243 183 51 923
John J. Gisvold United States 12 428 0.8× 259 0.7× 341 0.9× 154 0.6× 182 1.0× 21 841
Ermelinda Bonaccio United States 9 285 0.6× 234 0.6× 202 0.5× 196 0.8× 96 0.5× 15 600
L Junquera Gutierrez Chile 4 494 1.0× 727 1.9× 420 1.1× 160 0.7× 133 0.7× 4 1.1k
Dianne Georgian-Smith United States 20 595 1.2× 512 1.3× 464 1.2× 202 0.8× 191 1.0× 31 1.1k
Daniel E. Lehrer United States 5 499 1.0× 295 0.8× 351 0.9× 251 1.0× 149 0.8× 6 792
Alexis V. Nees United States 17 465 0.9× 401 1.0× 394 1.0× 440 1.8× 160 0.9× 33 1.0k
Volker Duda Germany 11 260 0.5× 185 0.5× 170 0.4× 141 0.6× 107 0.6× 41 525
Linda Hovanessian‐Larsen United States 13 269 0.5× 439 1.1× 224 0.6× 122 0.5× 192 1.0× 36 845
Peter M. Jokich United States 14 457 0.9× 365 0.9× 372 1.0× 358 1.5× 326 1.8× 20 1.1k
Giovanna Mariscotti Italy 17 303 0.6× 515 1.3× 293 0.7× 534 2.2× 263 1.4× 33 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by I. Schreer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Schreer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Schreer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Schreer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Schreer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Schreer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Schreer. The network helps show where I. Schreer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Schreer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Schreer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Schreer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. Schreer. I. Schreer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Albert, Ute‐Susann, et al.. (2018). S3-Leitlinie Mammakarzinom: Aktuelles zur Früherkennung und zum Mammographie-Screening. Der Radiologe. 59(1). 13–18. 1 indexed citations
2.
Obi, Nadia, et al.. (2010). Impact of the Quality assured Mamma Diagnostic (QuaMaDi) programme on survival of breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiology. 35(3). 286–292. 16 indexed citations
3.
Schreer, I.. (2009). Dense Breast Tissue as an Important Risk Factor for Breast Cancer and Implications for Early Detection. Breast Care. 4(2). 89–92. 27 indexed citations
4.
Schaefer, Fritz, P. Schaefer, Christoph Mundhenke, et al.. (2009). Breast ultrasound elastography—Results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. European Journal of Radiology. 77(3). 450–456. 102 indexed citations
5.
Heywang‐Köbrunner, Sylvia H., et al.. (2008). Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): Results of a European consensus meeting. European Journal of Radiology. 72(2). 289–294. 52 indexed citations
6.
Schaefer, Fritz, P. Schaefer, Daniela Peter, et al.. (2007). Factors associated with one step surgery in case of non-palpable breast cancer. European Journal of Radiology. 64(3). 426–431. 14 indexed citations
7.
Peter, Daniela, et al.. (2007). False-negative results after stereotactically guided vacuum biopsy. European Radiology. 18(1). 177–182. 9 indexed citations
8.
Schreer, I.. (2006). Early Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Breast Care. 1(4). 227–228. 1 indexed citations
9.
Wallis, Mathew, et al.. (2006). Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. European Radiology. 17(2). 581–588. 93 indexed citations
10.
Katalinic, Alexander, et al.. (2006). Beyond mammography screening: quality assurance in breast cancer diagnosis (The QuaMaDi Project). British Journal of Cancer. 96(1). 157–161. 25 indexed citations
11.
Schreer, I. & Jütta Lüttges. (2005). Precursor lesions of invasive breast cancer. European Journal of Radiology. 54(1). 62–71. 17 indexed citations
12.
Barreau, B., Isabelle de Mascarel, Gaëtan MacGrogan, et al.. (2005). Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Review of 909 cases with radiographic–pathologic correlations. European Journal of Radiology. 54(1). 55–61. 100 indexed citations
13.
Kettritz, Ute, et al.. (2004). Stereotactic vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients. Cancer. 100(2). 245–251. 165 indexed citations
14.
Kettritz, Ute, et al.. (2004). Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VB) in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. European Journal of Cancer Supplements. 2(3). 88–88. 3 indexed citations
15.
Heywang‐Köbrunner, Sylvia H., I. Schreer, Thomas Decker, & W. Böcker. (2002). Interdisciplinary consensus on the use and technique of vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy. European Journal of Radiology. 47(3). 232–236. 44 indexed citations
16.
Schreer, I., et al.. (1997). Results of breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer and the role of mammographic follow-up. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 38(4). 761–767. 31 indexed citations
17.
Faupel, Mark, D. Vanel, Volker Barth, et al.. (1997). Electropotential evaluation as a new technique for diagnosing breast lesions. European Journal of Radiology. 24(1). 33–38. 29 indexed citations
18.
Schulz, K.‐D., Volker Duda, I. Schreer, & Sylvia H. Heywang‐Köbrunner. (1997). Möglichkeiten der Brustkrebsfrüherkennung. Der Gynäkologe. 30(8). 631–636. 2 indexed citations
19.
Swart, Enno, et al.. (1993). Determinanten der Beobachter-Variabilität bei der Früherkennungsmammographie - eine ROC-Analyse. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 159(8). 187–193. 1 indexed citations
20.
Schreer, I., et al.. (1974). Esophageal replacement with lyophilic dura. Experimental research in young dogs. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 54(5). 619–619. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026