Replace Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology with:
Japanese Journal of Clinical OncologyJapan
American Journal of Clinical OncologyUnited States
Pathology InternationalJapan
Surgery TodayJapan
Diagnostic CytopathologyUnited States
PathologyAustralia
Pathology - Research and PracticeChina
Annals of Translational MedicineChina
American Journal of NephrologyUnited States
Surgical Clinics of North AmericaUnited States
Japanese Journal of Clinical OncologyJapanView profile →
Citations per field, relative to World Journal of Surgical Oncology
World Journal of Surgical Oncology · 1×
×0.824.8kSURGE
×1.334.7kONCOL
×1.433.8kPRM
×1.214.6kMB
×0.911.3kCR
Citations per year, relative to World Journal of Surgical Oncology
World Journal of Surgical Oncology · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Journal of Surgical Oncology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology
This network shows the impact of papers published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.