G. M. Hoffmann

87 papers receiving 817 citations

Peers

G. M. Hoffmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cancer Research 193
  • Oncology 253
  • Cell Biology 124
  • Reproductive Medicine 63
  • Plant Science 226
Replace Dennis R. Burholt with:
Dennis R. Burholt United States
Andrew Miller United States
Pu Zhang China
Tsuyoshi Yamashita Japan
Biola M. Javierre Spain
Shuang Liu China
Alistair J. Watt United States
Natalie K. Ryan Australia
June Liu China
Kenji Kamino Germany
G. M. Hoffmann relative to Dennis R. Burholt United States Dennis R. Burholt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Dennis R. Burholt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. M. Hoffmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. M. Hoffmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. M. Hoffmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. M. Hoffmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. M. Hoffmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. M. Hoffmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. M. Hoffmann. The network helps show where G. M. Hoffmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. M. Hoffmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. M. Hoffmann Line = papers co-authored together G. M. Hoffmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201175
2 200056
3 201047
4 199244
5 201135
6 201434
7 201330
8 201429
9 199127
10 200827
11 197726
12 201525
13 199921
14 199319
15 199818
16 198318
17 197916
18 200715
19 201215
20 198914

About G. M. Hoffmann

G. M. Hoffmann is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cell Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 96 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (14 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (12 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (10 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (8 papers), Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management (8 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (7 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (193 citations), Oncology (253 citations), Cell Biology (124 citations), Reproductive Medicine (63 citations) and Plant Science (226 citations). G. M. Hoffmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Joseph‐Alexander Verreet, Holger Klink, K. Pollow, Volker Möbus, Carsten Denkert, Sibylle Loibl, Silvia Darb‐Esfahani, W. Elger, J. E. Kruger and Marcus Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Microbiology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology and Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact