Tyreek Jones
About
In The Last Decade
Tyreek Jones
4 papers receiving 333 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Infectious Diseases 206
- Food Science 196
- Nutrition and Dietetics 69
- General Health Professions 41
- Epidemiology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Tyreek Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Tyreek Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tyreek Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tyreek Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tyreek Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tyreek Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tyreek Jones. The network helps show where Tyreek Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tyreek Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tyreek Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tyreek Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tyreek Jones. Tyreek Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 91 | |
| 3 | 137 | |
| 4 | 125 | |
| 5 | The Tennessee Foodborne Illness Surveillance Network (FoodNet). | 0 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.