Toru Nakano
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Immunology top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jin‐Kuk KimAnita G. SetoDavid P. BartelSatomi Kuramochi‐MiyagawaNelson C. LauRobert E. KingstonHideaki TadaJohji Inazawa
- Topics
- Esophageal and GI Pathology (23 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (19 papers)Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (19 papers)
- Cited by
- ImmunologyNephrologyOncology
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesGreece
In The Last Decade
Toru Nakano
113 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Immunology 862
- Surgery 763
- Oncology 687
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 526
Countries citing papers authored by Toru Nakano
This map shows the geographic impact of Toru Nakano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toru Nakano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toru Nakano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Toru Nakano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Toru Nakano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Toru Nakano. The network helps show where Toru Nakano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Toru Nakano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Toru Nakano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Toru Nakano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Toru Nakano. Toru Nakano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | [Surgical Techniques of Spontaneous Esophageal Rupture]. | 1 |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | Patients with Lung Recurrence after Curative Resection forPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Have a Better Prognosis than Those with Recurrence at Other Sites | 3 |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | Characterization of the piRNA Complex from Rat Testesbreakdown → | 727 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Isolation and Characterization of a Methanol-assimilating Yeast, Condida methanophilum sp.nov. : Study on the Fermentation of Methanol as a Sole Carbon Source(II). | 2 |
About Toru Nakano
Toru Nakano is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 129 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal and GI Pathology (23 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (19 papers) and Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (862 citations), Nephrology (251 citations) and Oncology (687 citations). Toru Nakano has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Jin‐Kuk Kim, Anita G. Seto, David P. Bartel, Satomi Kuramochi‐Miyagawa, Nelson C. Lau, Robert E. Kingston, Hideaki Tada, Johji Inazawa, Takashi Shinohara and Tasuku Honjo. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.