Satoshi Amada
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 15
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 4
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 17
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 5
- Co-authors
- Toshiharu KamuraHitoo NakanoToshio HirakawaYoshio ShimizuSeiryu KamoiFutoshi AkiyamaSteven G. SilverbergShinji Ogawa
- Journals
- Gynecologic Oncology (12 papers)Cancer (4 papers)International Journal of Gynecological Pathology (3 papers)International Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)Cytopathology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Satoshi Amada
37 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Reproductive Medicine 745
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 661
- Immunology 239
- Oncology 276
- Cancer Research 119
Countries citing papers authored by Satoshi Amada
This map shows the geographic impact of Satoshi Amada's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Satoshi Amada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Satoshi Amada more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Satoshi Amada
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Satoshi Amada. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Satoshi Amada. The network helps show where Satoshi Amada may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Satoshi Amada, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 58 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 212 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 58 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 206 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 41 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 47 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 41 |
About Satoshi Amada
Satoshi Amada is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Gastroenterology, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (17 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (15 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers) and Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (745 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (661 citations), Immunology (239 citations), Oncology (276 citations) and Cancer Research (119 citations). Satoshi Amada has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Toshiharu Kamura, Hitoo Nakano, Toshio Hirakawa, Yoshio Shimizu, Seiryu Kamoi, Futoshi Akiyama, Steven G. Silverberg, Shinji Ogawa, Hiroaki Kobayashi and Tsunehisa Kaku. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, International Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cytopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.