Tony Smith
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Development top 2%
- History top 2%
- Co-authors
- David C. HendricksonBertell OllmanMatt VidalFred MoseleyJohn WaltonGeorge RossTheda SkocpolAnne-Marie Slaughter
- Topics
- Political Economy and Marxism (16 papers)Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers)Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tony Smith
48 papers receiving 542 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Sociology and Political Science 418
- Political Science and International Relations 294
- Economics and Econometrics 80
- Development 69
- History 61
Countries citing papers authored by Tony Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Tony Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tony Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tony Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tony Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tony Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tony Smith. The network helps show where Tony Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tony Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tony Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tony Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tony Smith. Tony Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Marx's Capital and Hegel's Logic : a reexamination | 18 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | MARX, HEGEL AND DIALECTICS: A SYMPOSIUM (PART TWO). | 1 |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 147 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 64 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | The French stake in Algeria, 1945-1962 | 8 |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | The End of the European empire : decolonization after World War II | 5 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Tony Smith
Tony Smith is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Architecture and Development, having authored 54 papers that have together received 727 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Economy and Marxism (16 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (69 citations), Political Science and International Relations (294 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (418 citations). Tony Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David C. Hendrickson, Bertell Ollman, Matt Vidal, Fred Moseley, John Walton, George Ross, Theda Skocpol, Anne-Marie Slaughter, G. John Ikenberry and W. J. Macpherson. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Foreign Affairs and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.