Inderjeet Parmar
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Development top 2%
- History top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Naná de GraaffTobias ten BrinkLinda B. MillerG. John IkenberryDoug StokesMichael CoxHarold L. SmithOliver Turner
- Topics
- International Relations and Foreign Policy (15 papers)Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism (9 papers)Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Inderjeet Parmar
55 papers receiving 591 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Sociology and Political Science 387
- Political Science and International Relations 377
- Development 97
- History 70
- Strategy and Management 64
Countries citing papers authored by Inderjeet Parmar
This map shows the geographic impact of Inderjeet Parmar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inderjeet Parmar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inderjeet Parmar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inderjeet Parmar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inderjeet Parmar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inderjeet Parmar. The network helps show where Inderjeet Parmar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inderjeet Parmar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inderjeet Parmar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inderjeet Parmar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inderjeet Parmar. Inderjeet Parmar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 52 | |
| 4 | 46 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | Obama and the World:New Directions in US Foreign Policy | 18 |
| 8 | 106 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | Soft Power and US Foreign Policy | 8 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Mobilizing America for Internationalist Foreign Policy: The Role of the CFR | 2 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Inderjeet Parmar
Inderjeet Parmar is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Development and History, having authored 59 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (15 papers), Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism (9 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (97 citations), Political Science and International Relations (377 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (387 citations). Inderjeet Parmar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Naná de Graaff, Tobias ten Brink, Linda B. Miller, G. John Ikenberry, Doug Stokes, Michael Cox, Harold L. Smith, Oliver Turner, Till Geiger and Nicolas Guilhot. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, International Affairs and Ethnic and Racial Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.