This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cane more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cane. The network helps show where Peter Cane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Cane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Cane.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Cane based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Cane. Peter Cane is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cane, Peter, et al.. (2012). Principles of administrative law : legal regulation of governance. Oxford University Press eBooks.6 indexed citations
2.
Cane, Peter. (2011). Searching for United States Tort Law in the Antipodes. Pepperdine law review. 38(2). 4.1 indexed citations
3.
Cane, Peter. (2011). Administrative Law (5th ed). Oxford University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
4.
Cane, Peter. (2009). Judicial Review in the Age of Tribunals. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 479–500.2 indexed citations
5.
Cane, Peter. (2008). Taking Disagreement Seriously: Courts, Legislatures and the Reform of Tort Law. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Cane, Peter. (2004). Another Failed Sterilisation. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).5 indexed citations
8.
Cane, Peter. (2004). Church, State and Human Rights: are parish councils public authorities?. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).4 indexed citations
9.
Cane, Peter. (2004). The Doctor, the Stork and the Court: a modern morality play. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).1 indexed citations
10.
Cane, Peter. (2003). The Making of Australian Administrative Law. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).3 indexed citations
11.
Cane, Peter. (2003). Reforming Tort Law in Australia: A Personal Perspective. Melbourne University law review. 27(3). 649.4 indexed citations
12.
Cane, Peter, et al.. (2001). Relating to Responsibility Essays for Tony Honoré on His Eightieth Birthday.2 indexed citations
13.
Calabresi, Guido, Peter Cane, Robert D. Cooter, et al.. (2001). Economic, Moral Philosophy, and the Positive Analysis of Tort Law.1 indexed citations
14.
Cane, Peter. (2000). Vicarious Liability for Sexual Abuse. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).2 indexed citations
Cane, Peter. (1999). Multiple Torts, Contribution and the Dynamics of the Settlement Process. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).1 indexed citations
17.
Baldwin, Richard & Peter Cane. (1997). Law and Uncertainty:Risks and Legal Processes.3 indexed citations
18.
Cane, Peter. (1995). Standing up for the Public. Public law. 276–287.4 indexed citations
19.
Cane, Peter. (1992). Private Rights and Public Procedure. Public law. 193–200.2 indexed citations
20.
Cane, Peter. (1990). Statutes, Standing and Representation. Public law. 307–312.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.