Tom Scott

975 citations
56 papers · 260 indexed · h-index 8

Tom Scott

38 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers

Tom Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • History 78
  • Classics 15
  • Political Science and International Relations 83
  • Economics and Econometrics 76
  • Applied Psychology 9
Replace John F. Guilmartin with:
John F. Guilmartin United States
Roy Porter
S. J. Connolly United Kingdom
Michael Allen Gillespie United States
Louis A. Knafla Canada
Peter Rushton United Kingdom
Martha Ellis François Mexico
David Mills United Kingdom
James P. Carley Canada
Andrew Wear United Kingdom
Tom Scott relative to John F. Guilmartin United States John F. Guilmartin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
John F. Guilmartin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Scott. The network helps show where Tom Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Tom Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Scott Line = papers co-authored together Tom Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 202117
3 20191
4 20170
5 20140
6 200114
7 20013
8
The peasantries of Europe : from the fourteenth to the eighteenth centuries
199838
9
Regional Identity and Economic Change: The Upper Rhine 1450-1600
19983
10 19911
11
Environmental politics: A greenprint for New Zealand
19906
12 198811
13 198740
14 19830
15 19793
16 19791
17 19784
18
The golf immortals
19691
19
Ulysses' Last Voyage--A Reply
19660
20
Observations on Scottish Studies
19630

About Tom Scott

Tom Scott is a scholar working on History, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Classics, having authored 56 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (19 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (11 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (5 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (4 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers) and European Political History Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (78 citations), Classics (15 citations), Political Science and International Relations (83 citations), Economics and Econometrics (76 citations) and Applied Psychology (9 citations). Tom Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Donald M. Prue, Robert G. Rychtarik, David W. Foy, Karl H. Dannenfeldt, Hanna van Waart, Geoffrey Palmer, Simon J Mitchell, Paul M. Hohenberg, Gerald L. Soliday and Bob Scribner. Their work appears in journals such as The Historical Journal, German Studies Review, The American Historical Review, Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte - Archive for Reformation History and Journal of Early Modern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026