Michael Allen Gillespie
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- David R. BrownMohammad AsifEdward M. DwyerBurleigh Taylor WilkinsRichard B. BernsteinRobert M. K. CarlsonJohn Allphin MooreAlexander Burns
- Topics
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (7 papers)Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (7 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael Allen Gillespie
25 papers receiving 228 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Sociology and Political Science 108
- Philosophy 102
- Political Science and International Relations 59
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 32
- History 21
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Allen Gillespie
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Allen Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Allen Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Allen Gillespie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Allen Gillespie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Allen Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Allen Gillespie. The network helps show where Michael Allen Gillespie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Allen Gillespie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Allen Gillespie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Allen Gillespie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Allen Gillespie. Michael Allen Gillespie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 119 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Public philosophy and political science : crisis and reflection | 3 |
| 12 | Philosophy and Rhetoric in Kant’s Third Antinomy | 2 |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | Nihilism Before Nietzsche | 37 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Michael Allen Gillespie
Michael Allen Gillespie is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (7 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (7 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (102 citations), Political Science and International Relations (59 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (108 citations). Michael Allen Gillespie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David R. Brown, Mohammad Asif, Edward M. Dwyer, Burleigh Taylor Wilkins, Richard B. Bernstein, Robert M. K. Carlson, John Allphin Moore, Alexander Burns, Gottfried E. Konecny and Edward B. McLean. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology and European Journal of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.