Tom Griffiths

473 total citations
37 papers, 276 citations indexed

About

Tom Griffiths is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Griffiths has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 276 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Occupational Therapy, 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Tom Griffiths's work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (12 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers). Tom Griffiths is often cited by papers focused on Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (12 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers). Tom Griffiths collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Tom Griffiths's co-authors include Michael Clarke, K. V. Petrides, Falk Lieder, M. Clarke, John Swettenham, Jenefer Sargent, Paul M. Krueger, Ruthe Foushee, Rachit Dubey and Terry Patterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Cognitive Science, Disability and Rehabilitation and Research in Developmental Disabilities.

In The Last Decade

Tom Griffiths

30 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tom Griffiths United Kingdom	11	103	89	85	50	38	37	276
Robert James Wolfe United States	6	217 2.1×	85 1.0×	42 0.5×	13 0.3×	53 1.4×	12	354
Jessica Miller United States	10	47 0.5×	19 0.2×	199 2.3×	116 2.3×	151 4.0×	18	482
Katie Lyon United States	9	52 0.5×	12 0.1×	23 0.3×	31 0.6×	57 1.5×	13	365
Alejandro E. Brice United States	14	6 0.1×	86 1.0×	102 1.2×	139 2.8×	28 0.7×	42	531
Sarah Helps United Kingdom	8	5 0.0×	15 0.2×	111 1.3×	88 1.8×	22 0.6×	14	349
António M. Diniz Portugal	11	7 0.1×	57 0.6×	65 0.8×	8 0.2×	20 0.5×	32	331
Elizabeth J. Bruce Australia	11	7 0.1×	31 0.3×	228 2.7×	14 0.3×	90 2.4×	18	417
Paula Flynn Canada	10	10 0.1×	8 0.1×	54 0.6×	30 0.6×	41 1.1×	18	284
Alexander M. Wilson Canada	10	5 0.0×	43 0.5×	67 0.8×	86 1.7×	8 0.2×	17	437
Julia L. Ferguson United States	14	9 0.1×	116 1.3×	188 2.2×	347 6.9×	23 0.6×	54	523

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Griffiths

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Griffiths

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Griffiths. The network helps show where Tom Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Griffiths

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Griffiths. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Griffiths based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Griffiths. Tom Griffiths is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Griffiths, Tom, et al.. (2025). AI, communication aids and the challenge of authentic authorship – Whose line is it anyway‽. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 19(2). 102–112.

Hayes, Daniel, et al.. (2025). Developing Collaborative Relationships between Professionals and Parents of Children with Neurodisability: A Meta-Narrative Review. Current Developmental Disorders Reports. 12(1). 1 indexed citations

Sargent, Jenefer, et al.. (2024). The Functional Vision for Communication Questionnaire (FVC-Q): Exploring Parental Report of Non-Speaking Children's Fixation Skills Using a Structured History-Taking Approach. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 27(1-2). 27–33.

Griffiths, Tom, et al.. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): community consultation on risks, benefits and the need for a code of practice. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 18(4). 232–247. 5 indexed citations

Griffiths, Tom, Simon Judge, & David Souto. (2024). Use of eye-gaze technology feedback by assistive technology professionals: findings from a thematic analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 19(7). 2708–2725. 1 indexed citations

Griffiths, Tom, Michael Clarke, & John Swettenham. (2023). The ability of typically developing 2–3 year olds to infer the control mechanism for eye-gaze technology and the impact of causal language instruction. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 19(7). 2557–2564.

Zhang, Qiong, et al.. (2021). A Rational Account of Anchor Effects in Hindsight Bias. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 43(43).

Griffiths, Tom, Abdullah Almaatouq, Ekaterina Damer, et al.. (2021). Scaling up experimental social, behavioral, and economic science. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations

Karlsson, Petra, Tom Griffiths, Michael Clarke, et al.. (2021). Stakeholder consensus for decision making in eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy service provision: findings from a Delphi study. BMC Neurology. 21(1). 63–63. 19 indexed citations

10.

Kleiman‐Weiner, Max, et al.. (2020). Downloading Culture.zip: Social learning by program induction.. Cognitive Science. 2 indexed citations

11.

DeNero, John, et al.. (2020). Investigating the Behavior of Malicious Actors Through the Game of Mafia.. Cognitive Science. 1 indexed citations

12.

Dubey, Rachit, Tom Griffiths, & Tania Lombrozo. (2019). If it's important, then I am curious: A value intervention to induce curiosity.. Cognitive Science. 282–288. 10 indexed citations

13.

Rafferty, Anna N., et al.. (2018). Modeling the Dunning-Kruger Effect: A Rational Account of Inaccurate Self-Assessment.. Cognitive Science. 1 indexed citations

14.

Krueger, Paul M. & Tom Griffiths. (2018). Shaping Model-Free Habits with Model-Based Goals.. Cognitive Science. 1 indexed citations

15.

Rafferty, Anna N., et al.. (2017). Algebra is not like trivia: Evaluating self-assessment in an online math tutor.. Cognitive Science. 2 indexed citations

16.

Foushee, Ruthe, Tom Griffiths, & Mahesh Srinivasan. (2016). Lexical Complexity of Child-Directed and Overheard Speech: Implications for Learning.. Cognitive Science. 8 indexed citations

17.

Clarke, Michael, et al.. (2012). An Examination of Relations Between Participation, Communication and Age in Children with Complex Communication Needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 28(1). 44–51. 26 indexed citations

18.

Clarke, M., et al.. (2010). Factors associated with the participation of children with complex communication needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 32(2). 774–780. 40 indexed citations

19.

Griffiths, Tom, et al.. (1997). Results of the 1996 National Lifeguard Survey: Operation Baywatch.. Parks & recreation. 32(11). 62–68. 3 indexed citations

20.

Griffiths, Tom. (1995). Systematic Scanning for Lifeguards.. Parks & recreation. 30(2).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact