Tom Chapman
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 7
- Insect behavior and control techniques 1
-
- Plant and animal studies 8
- Co-authors
- Robin FloydFran ThomasJ. MannEyualem AbebeMark BlaxterClaire WhittonBernard J. CrespiMichael P. Schwarz
- Journals
- Insectes Sociaux (2 papers)Appetite (1 paper)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)Ecological Entomology (1 paper)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tom Chapman
11 papers receiving 846 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Insect Science 200
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 301
- Ecology 287
- Ecological Modeling 41
- Genetics 245
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Chapman
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Chapman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Chapman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Chapman. The network helps show where Tom Chapman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Tom Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 6 | Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 647 |
| 7 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 68 |
About Tom Chapman
Tom Chapman is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 879 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper), Insect behavior and control techniques (1 paper) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (200 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (301 citations), Ecology (287 citations), Ecological Modeling (41 citations) and Genetics (245 citations). Tom Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robin Floyd, Fran Thomas, J. Mann, Eyualem Abebe, Mark Blaxter, Claire Whitton, Bernard J. Crespi, Michael P. Schwarz, Michael McLeish and Steven J. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Insectes Sociaux, Appetite, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Ecological Entomology and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.