Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Molecular pathology of schizophrenia: more than one disease process?
This map shows the geographic impact of T.J. Crow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.J. Crow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.J. Crow more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.J. Crow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.J. Crow. The network helps show where T.J. Crow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T.J. Crow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T.J. Crow.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T.J. Crow based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T.J. Crow. T.J. Crow is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chance, Steven A., et al.. (2006). Surface area asymmetries are lost and mini-column spacing is reduced in planum temporale in schizophrenia: A post-mortem study. Schizophrenia Research. 81. 27–28.2 indexed citations
2.
Chance, Steven A., et al.. (2006). Reduced neuron density in fusiform cortex in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 81. 209–210.2 indexed citations
3.
Mackay, Clare E., et al.. (2006). Abnormal functional correlate precedes loss of structural asymmetry in the paracingulate sulcus in adolescent psychosis. Schizophrenia Research. 81. 157–157.2 indexed citations
Cranfield, Michael R., Kirsty S. Hewitson, Nic A. Williams, et al.. (2002). Demonstration of protocadherin X/Y immunoreactive neurones in human cerebral cortex. Schizophrenia Research. 53. 68–69.2 indexed citations
7.
Chance, Steven A., et al.. (2002). Cell density in the planum temporale in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 53. 106–106.9 indexed citations
8.
Crow, T.J., et al.. (2002). A post-mortem study of 5-HT-containing neurons of the dorsal raphe nucleus in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 53. 108–108.1 indexed citations
9.
Chance, Steven A., Simon L. Collinson, Anthony James, & T.J. Crow. (2002). Abnormality of the semantic network in adolescent subjects with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 53. 118–118.2 indexed citations
Crow, T.J.. (1980). Molecular pathology of schizophrenia: more than one disease process?. BMJ. 280(6207). 66–68.1386 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Crow, T.J. & Elaine Johnstone. (1977). Stereochemical specificity in the antipsychotic effects of flupenthixol in man [proceedings].. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 59(3). 466P–466P.4 indexed citations
20.
Crow, T.J., J.F.W. Deakin, & A. Longden. (1975). Proceedings: Do anti-psychotic drugs act by dopamine receptor blockade in the nucleus accumbens.. VocBench (University of Rome Tor Vergata). 55(2). 295P–296P.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.