Titia Gebuis

2.3k total citations
31 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Titia Gebuis is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Education and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Titia Gebuis has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Statistics and Probability, 16 papers in Education and 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Titia Gebuis's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (22 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (16 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers). Titia Gebuis is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (22 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (16 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers). Titia Gebuis collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Titia Gebuis's co-authors include Bert Reynvoet, Wim Gevers, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Maarten J. van der Smagt, Emmy Defever, Dénes Szűcs, Florence Gabriel, Amy Devine, Edward H.F. de Haan and August B. Smit and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Titia Gebuis

31 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Titia Gebuis

EDUCA

DEP

ECP

Ben M. Harvey Netherlands

Oana Tudusciuc Germany

Stanislas Dehaene France

Maria Grazia Tosto United Kingdom

Petra Vetter United Kingdom

Johan Lauwereyns Japan

Marcin Szwed Poland

Noam Siegelman United States

Mark Yates United States

Matthew I. Leon United States

Ben M. Harvey Netherlands

Titia Gebuis

581 ×0.4

270 ×0.3

EDUCA

1.5k ×2.4

110 ×0.2

DEP

137 ×1.1

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Titia Gebuis Titia Gebuis (= 1×) peers Ben M. Harvey

Countries citing papers authored by Titia Gebuis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Titia Gebuis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Titia Gebuis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Titia Gebuis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Titia Gebuis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Titia Gebuis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Titia Gebuis. The network helps show where Titia Gebuis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Titia Gebuis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Titia Gebuis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Titia Gebuis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Titia Gebuis. Titia Gebuis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kramvis, Ioannis, Titia Gebuis, Rolinka J. van der Loo, et al.. (2019). Gpr158 Deficiency Impacts Hippocampal CA1 Neuronal Excitability, Dendritic Architecture, and Affects Spatial Learning. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 13. 465–465. 23 indexed citations

Stringer, Sven, Titia Gebuis, Iryna Paliukhovich, et al.. (2019). Combined cellomics and proteomics analysis reveals shared neuronal morphology and molecular pathway phenotypes for multiple schizophrenia risk genes. Molecular Psychiatry. 26(3). 784–799. 24 indexed citations

Detrez, Jan R., Peter Verstraelen, Titia Gebuis, et al.. (2016). Image Informatics Strategies for Deciphering Neuronal Network Connectivity. Advances in anatomy, embryology and cell biology. 219. 123–148. 5 indexed citations

Smets, Karolien, Titia Gebuis, Emmy Defever, & Bert Reynvoet. (2014). Concurrent validity of approximate number sense tasks in adults and children. Acta Psychologica. 150. 120–128. 34 indexed citations

Gebuis, Titia & Bert Reynvoet. (2013). The Neural Mechanism Underlying Ordinal Numerosity Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 26(5). 1013–1020. 15 indexed citations

Szűcs, Dénes, et al.. (2013). Visual stimulus parameters seriously compromise the measurement of approximate number system acuity and comparative effects between adults and children. Frontiers in Psychology. 4. 444–444. 127 indexed citations

Smets, Karolien, Titia Gebuis, & Bert Reynvoet. (2013). Comparing the neural distance effect derived from the non–symbolic comparison and the same–different task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. 28–28. 16 indexed citations

Defever, Emmy, Bert Reynvoet, & Titia Gebuis. (2013). Task- and age-dependent effects of visual stimulus properties on children’s explicit numerosity judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 116(2). 216–233. 34 indexed citations

Gebuis, Titia & Bert Reynvoet. (2012). The neural mechanisms underlying passive and active processing of numerosity. NeuroImage. 70. 301–307. 49 indexed citations

10.

Anema, Helen A., et al.. (2012). Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing. Experimental Brain Research. 218(3). 373–380. 17 indexed citations

11.

Defever, Emmy, Delphine Sasanguie, Titia Gebuis, & Bert Reynvoet. (2011). Children’s representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude examined with the priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 109(2). 174–186. 31 indexed citations

12.

Gebuis, Titia & Bert Reynvoet. (2011). Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli. Behavior Research Methods. 43(4). 981–986. 192 indexed citations

13.

Gebuis, Titia & Bert Reynvoet. (2011). The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 141(4). 642–648. 271 indexed citations

14.

Gebuis, Titia & Maarten J. van der Smagt. (2011). False Approximations of the Approximate Number System?. PLoS ONE. 6(10). e25405–e25405. 49 indexed citations

15.

Gebuis, Titia & Wim Gevers. (2011). Numerosities and space; indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009). Cognition. 121(2). 248–252. 53 indexed citations

16.

Nijboer, Tanja C.W., Titia Gebuis, Susan F. te Pas, & Maarten J. van der Smagt. (2010). Interactions between colour and synaesthetic colour: An effect of simultaneous colour contrast on synaesthetic colours. Vision Research. 51(1). 43–47. 10 indexed citations

17.

Gebuis, Titia, J. Leon Kenemans, Edward H.F. de Haan, & Maarten J. van der Smagt. (2009). Conflict processing of symbolic and non-symbolic numerosity. Neuropsychologia. 48(2). 394–401. 19 indexed citations

18.

Gebuis, Titia, Tanja C.W. Nijboer, & Maarten J. van der Smagt. (2009). Multiple dimensions in bi‐directional synesthesia. European Journal of Neuroscience. 29(8). 1703–1710. 33 indexed citations

19.

Gebuis, Titia, et al.. (2009). The development of automated access to symbolic and non‐symbolic number knowledge in children: an ERP study. European Journal of Neuroscience. 30(10). 1999–2008. 18 indexed citations

20.

Gebuis, Titia, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Edward H.F. de Haan, & Avishai Henik. (2008). Automatic quantity processing in 5-year olds and adults. Cognitive Processing. 10(2). 133–142. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact