NeuroImage

21.8k papers and 1.6M indexed citations i.

About

The 21.8k papers published in NeuroImage in the last decades have received a total of 1.6M indexed citations. Papers published in NeuroImage usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (15.1k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (7.4k papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7.9k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5.4k papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in NeuroImage are Karl Friston, John Ashburner, Bruce Fischl, Mark Jenkinson, Stephen M. Smith, Anders M. Dale, Thomas E. Nichols, Olaf Sporns, Mark W. Woolrich and Christian F. Beckmann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in NeuroImage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NeuroImage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NeuroImage.

Countries where authors publish in NeuroImage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NeuroImage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NeuroImage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NeuroImage more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025