Tino Dyhring
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Philip K. AhringPalle ChristophersenDorte StrøbækSøren‐Peter OlesenDan PetersElsebet Ø. NielsenBo JensenDaniel B. Timmermann
- Topics
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (20 papers)Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (19 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (15 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryBrain Research
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Tino Dyhring
39 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 649
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 269
- Pharmacology 254
- Physiology 222
Countries citing papers authored by Tino Dyhring
This map shows the geographic impact of Tino Dyhring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tino Dyhring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tino Dyhring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tino Dyhring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tino Dyhring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tino Dyhring. The network helps show where Tino Dyhring may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tino Dyhring
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tino Dyhring. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tino Dyhring based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tino Dyhring. Tino Dyhring is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 89 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 186 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 132 | |
| 18 | 150 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Tino Dyhring
Tino Dyhring is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Sensory Systems, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (20 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (19 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (649 citations), Sensory Systems (145 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.3k citations). Tino Dyhring has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Philip K. Ahring, Palle Christophersen, Dorte Strøbæk, Søren‐Peter Olesen, Dan Peters, Elsebet Ø. Nielsen, Bo Jensen, Daniel B. Timmermann, Asli Silahtaroglu and Claus Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.