Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
CodeBERT: A Pre-Trained Model for Programming and Natural Languages
20201.4k citationsDuyu Tang, Bing Qin et al.profile →
Learning Sentiment-Specific Word Embedding for Twitter Sentiment Classification
2014781 citationsDuyu Tang, Ming Zhou et al.profile →
Aspect Level Sentiment Classification with Deep Memory Network
2016675 citationsDuyu Tang, Bing Qin et al.profile →
Citations per year, relative to Ting Liu Ting Liu (= 1×)
peers
William B. Frakes
Countries citing papers authored by Ting Liu
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ting Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ting Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ting Liu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ting Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ting Liu. The network helps show where Ting Liu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ting Liu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ting Liu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ting Liu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ting Liu. Ting Liu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Guo, Jiang, Wanxiang Che, Haifeng Wang, Ting Liu, & Jun Xu. (2016). A Unified Architecture for Semantic Role Labeling and Relation Classification. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1264–1274.8 indexed citations
11.
Zhao, Yanyan, Wanxiang Che, Honglei Guo, et al.. (2014). Sentence Compression for Target-Polarity Word Collocation Extraction. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1360–1369.9 indexed citations
12.
Liu, Ting, Kit W. Cho, George Aaron Broadwell, et al.. (2014). Automatic Expansion of the MRC Psycholinguistic Database Imageability Ratings. Language Resources and Evaluation. 2800–2805.7 indexed citations
Ding, Xiao, Bing Qin, & Ting Liu. (2013). Building Chinese Event Type Paradigm Based on Trigger Clustering. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 311–319.2 indexed citations
15.
Liu, Ting. (2011). A Weighted Voting Based Automatic Term Recognition Method. Zhongwen xinxi xuebao.1 indexed citations
16.
Song, Wei, Yu Zhang, Ting Liu, & Sheng Li. (2010). Bridging Topic Modeling and Personalized Search. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1167–1175.15 indexed citations
Yang, Xiaofeng, et al.. (2008). An Entity-Mention Model for Coreference Resolution with Inductive Logic Programming. National University of Singapore. 843–851.46 indexed citations
19.
Zhao, Shiqi, Ming Zhou, & Ting Liu. (2007). Learning question paraphrases for QA from Encarta logs. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1795–1800.19 indexed citations
20.
Weigang, Li, Ting Liu, Zhen Wang, & Sheng Li. (2004). Aligning Bilingual Corpora Using Sentences Location Information. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 141–147.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.