Tina Overton

2.2k total citations
62 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Tina Overton is a scholar working on Education, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Overton has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Education, 16 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and 14 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tina Overton's work include Various Chemistry Research Topics (15 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (12 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (11 papers). Tina Overton is often cited by papers focused on Various Chemistry Research Topics (15 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (12 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (11 papers). Tina Overton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Tina Overton's co-authors include Mark T. Weller, Fräser A. Armstrong, Christopher D. Thompson, Peter Atkins, Jonathan P. Rourke, Subhalakshmi Nagarajan, Mahbub Sarkar, Gerry Rayner, P. W. Atkins and Duward F. Shriver and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Chemical Communications and Green Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Tina Overton

61 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tina Overton United Kingdom 22 789 272 251 213 165 62 1.6k
Richard S. Moog United States 21 683 0.9× 237 0.9× 278 1.1× 782 3.7× 50 0.3× 32 2.0k
Susan E. Shadle United States 21 341 0.4× 351 1.3× 77 0.3× 84 0.4× 463 2.8× 49 1.7k
J. N. Spencer United States 21 491 0.6× 189 0.7× 183 0.7× 360 1.7× 91 0.6× 79 1.5k
Joel W. Russell United States 17 848 1.1× 143 0.5× 497 2.0× 299 1.4× 69 0.4× 27 2.1k
Veijo Meisalo Finland 23 457 0.6× 249 0.9× 253 1.0× 89 0.4× 134 0.8× 147 1.9k
Mauro Mocerino Australia 24 686 0.9× 336 1.2× 282 1.1× 211 1.0× 112 0.7× 106 1.9k
Norbert J. Pienta United States 19 378 0.5× 56 0.2× 128 0.5× 293 1.4× 46 0.3× 76 1.1k
David W. Shaffer United States 18 146 0.2× 282 1.0× 238 0.9× 34 0.2× 247 1.5× 42 1.4k
Susan E. Groh United States 11 432 0.5× 198 0.7× 93 0.4× 30 0.1× 116 0.7× 16 978
James P. Birk United States 16 293 0.4× 113 0.4× 107 0.4× 161 0.8× 128 0.8× 61 915

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Overton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Overton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Overton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Overton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Overton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Overton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Overton. The network helps show where Tina Overton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Overton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Overton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Overton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Overton. Tina Overton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sarkar, Mahbub, Tina Overton, Christopher D. Thompson, & Gerry Rayner. (2019). Academics’ perspectives of the teaching and development of generic employability skills in science curricula. Higher Education Research & Development. 39(2). 346–361. 47 indexed citations
2.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2018). Undergraduate recognition of curriculum-related skill development and the skills employers are seeking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 20(1). 68–84. 45 indexed citations
3.
Ziebell, Angela, et al.. (2018). ‘What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?’ A comparison of the views of students and teaching staff across three universities. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 19(2). 463–473. 29 indexed citations
4.
Ziebell, Angela, Russell R. A. Kitson, Paolo Coppo, et al.. (2018). Investigating student and staff perceptions of students' experiences in teaching laboratories through the lens of meaningful learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 20(1). 187–196. 19 indexed citations
5.
Ziebell, Angela, et al.. (2018). Inquiry and industry inspired laboratories: the impact on students’ perceptions of skill development and engagements. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 19(2). 583–596. 22 indexed citations
6.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2018). Transforming laboratory teaching assistants as teaching leaders. Higher Education Research & Development. 37(7). 1380–1394. 7 indexed citations
7.
Sarkar, Mahbub, et al.. (2017). Undergraduate Science Students' Perceptions of Employability: Efficacy of an Intervention. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 25(5). 21–37. 8 indexed citations
8.
Thompson, Christopher D., et al.. (2016). Development of a chemistry critical thinking test: initial reliability and validity studies. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference). 38. 2 indexed citations
9.
Sarkar, Mahbub, Tina Overton, Christopher D. Thompson, & Gerry Rayner. (2016). Graduate Employability: Views of Recent Science Graduates and Employers. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 24(3). 31–48. 78 indexed citations
10.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2016). The development of mapping tool for work-based learning activities. Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning. 6(3). 277–287. 5 indexed citations
11.
Sands, David & Tina Overton. (2016). Cognitive psychology and problem solving in the physical sciences. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences. 21–25. 1 indexed citations
12.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2013). A study of approaches to solving open-ended problems in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 14(4). 468–475. 35 indexed citations
13.
Clair‐Thompson, Helen St, et al.. (2010). Information processing: a review of implications of Johnstone’s model for science education. Research in Science & Technological Education. 28(2). 131–148. 16 indexed citations
14.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2010). Internationalisation of the chemistry curriculum: two problem-based learning activities for undergraduate chemists. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 11(2). 124–128. 10 indexed citations
15.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2009). Student Solutions Manual for Descriptive Inorganic Chemistry. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations
16.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2008). Solving open-ended problems, and the influence of cognitive factors on student success. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 9(1). 65–69. 28 indexed citations
17.
Atkins, Peter, et al.. (2006). Shriver and Atkins' Inorganic Chemistry. Oxford University Press eBooks. 318 indexed citations
18.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2006). Chemistry in sport: context-based e-learning in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 7(3). 195–202. 40 indexed citations
19.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (2003). Peer Reviewed: Problem-Solving Case Studies. Analytical Chemistry. 75(7). 181 A–182 A. 19 indexed citations
20.
Overton, Tina, et al.. (1993). Characterisation of Cr–silica polymerisation catalysts. Journal of the Chemical Society Faraday Transactions. 89(5). 843–849. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026