Sheila Bonas

16 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative resear...200620262012201920062007200400600

Peers

Sheila Bonas
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • General Health Professions 478
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 359
  • Sociology and Political Science 248
  • Clinical Psychology 231
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 128
Replace Jeanne Daly with:
Jeanne Daly Australia
Patricia F. Pearce United States
Catherine van Mossel Canada
Samantha Scott United States
Odette Parry United Kingdom
Miles Little Australia
Stanley Reiser United States
Stephen D. Brown United States
Emma Hughes Australia
Ashrita Saran United Kingdom
Sheila Bonas relative to Jeanne Daly Australia Jeanne Daly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jeanne Daly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sheila Bonas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheila Bonas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheila Bonas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheila Bonas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheila Bonas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheila Bonas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheila Bonas. The network helps show where Sheila Bonas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sheila Bonas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sheila Bonas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sheila Bonas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sheila Bonas. Sheila Bonas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 21
2 18
3 52
4 43
5 9
6 15
7 17
8 17
9 8
10 36
11
Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methodsbreakdown →
446
12 11
13 23
14
How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspectivebreakdown →
630
15 41
16
Pets in the network of family relationships: an empirical study
60

About Sheila Bonas

Sheila Bonas is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health and Pharmacy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (47 citations), General Health Professions (478 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (359 citations). Sheila Bonas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Shaw, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Tina Miller, Jonathan A. Smith, Andrew Booth, Alex J. Sutton, Bridget Young, David R. Jones, Rakesh Patel and Carolyn Tarrant. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, British Journal of Cancer and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026