Tina Koch

6.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
85 papers, 4.5k citations indexed

About

Tina Koch is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Koch has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 4.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in General Health Professions, 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Tina Koch's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (15 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (9 papers) and Family Support in Illness (7 papers). Tina Koch is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (15 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (9 papers) and Family Support in Illness (7 papers). Tina Koch collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Tina Koch's co-authors include Debbie Kralik, Ann Harrington, Kay Price, Christine Webb, Kerry Telford, Natalie Howard, Merilyn Annells, Isabel Higgins, Karen Wotton and Jenny Huangfu Day and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Advanced Nursing and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

In The Last Decade

Tina Koch

83 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail

1994 675 citations Tina Koch Journal of Advanced Nursing profile →

Peers

Tina Koch

GHP

SPS

CP

PHEOH

PMH

Michael Bury United Kingdom

Ann Bonner Australia

Albine Moser Netherlands

Richard Layte Ireland

Rachel Shaw United Kingdom

Barbara Paterson Canada

Cynthia K. Russell United States

Debbie Cavers United Kingdom

Lisa Arai United Kingdom

Brenda M. DeVellis United States

Michael Bury United Kingdom

Tina Koch

1.9k ×1.2

GHP

1.2k ×1.4

SPS

870 ×1.2

CP

581 ×0.8

PHEOH

782 ×1.8

PMH

Citations per year, relative to Tina Koch Tina Koch (= 1×) peers Michael Bury

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Koch

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Koch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Koch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Koch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Koch

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Koch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Koch. The network helps show where Tina Koch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Koch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Koch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Koch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Koch. Tina Koch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Koch, Tina, Ralf S. Mueller, Britta Dobenecker, & Andrea Fischer. (2016). Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in Dogs Treated with Antiepileptic Drugs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 3. 27–27. 2 indexed citations

2.

Lenz, Mark, et al.. (2012). Traumatische Dissektion der A. carotis interna nach HWS-Beschleunigungstrauma. Der Unfallchirurg. 115(4). 369–376. 6 indexed citations

3.

Lenz, Mark, et al.. (2012). Traumatische Dissektion der A. carotis interna nach HWS-Beschleunigungstrauma: Diagnostik und Therapie einer häufig übersehenen aber potenziell gefährlichen Begleitverletzung. Der Unfallchirurg. 115(4). 369–376.

4.

Harteis, Christian, et al.. (2008). How intuition contributes to high performance: An educational perspective. US-China education review. 5(1). 68–80. 20 indexed citations

5.

Koch, Tina, et al.. (2007). Researching with centenarians. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 2(1). 52–61. 15 indexed citations

6.

Koch, Tina. (2006). 30th anniversary commentary on Koch T. (1994) Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19, 976–986. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 53(1). 101–102. 5 indexed citations

7.

Koch, Tina. (2006). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 53(1). 91–100. 257 indexed citations

8.

Koch, Tina, Christopher Power, & Debbie Kralik. (2006). Exploring longevity with Australian centenarians. 24(4). 5. 6 indexed citations

9.

Jenkin, Peter, Tina Koch, & Debbie Kralik. (2006). The experience of fatigue for adults living with HIV. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 15(9). 1123–1131. 35 indexed citations

10.

Kralik, Debbie, et al.. (2005). 100 years old: 24 Australian centenarians tell their stories. Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University). 3 indexed citations

11.

Kralik, Debbie, et al.. (2005). The ethics of research using electronic mail discussion groups. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 52(5). 537–545. 17 indexed citations

12.

Koch, Tina, et al.. (2001). Evaluating a community nursing service: listening to the voices of clients with an intellectual disability and/or their proxies. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 10(3). 352–363. 26 indexed citations

13.

Annells, Merilyn & Tina Koch. (2001). ‘The real stuff’: implications for nursing of assessing and measuring a terminally ill person’s quality of life. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 10(6). 806–812. 3 indexed citations

14.

Annells, Merilyn & Tina Koch. (2001). 'The real stuff': implications for nursing of assessing and measuring a terminally ill person's quality of life. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 10(6). 806–812. 17 indexed citations

15.

Kralik, Debbie, et al.. (2001). Women’s experiences of ‘being diagnosed’ with a long‐term illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 33(5). 594–602. 83 indexed citations

16.

Koch, Tina & Debbie Kralik. (2001). Chronic illness: reflections on a community‐based action research programme. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 36(1). 23–31. 46 indexed citations

17.

Annells, Merilyn, et al.. (2001). Client relevant care and quality of life: the trial of a Client Generated Index (CGI) tool for community nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 38(1). 9–16. 26 indexed citations

18.

Koch, Tina, et al.. (2000). Men living with diabetes: minimizing the intrusiveness of the disease. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 9(2). 247–254. 45 indexed citations

19.

Mitchell, Patricia & Tina Koch. (1997). An attempt to give nursing home residents a voice in the quality improvement process: the challenge of frailty. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 6(6). 453–461. 36 indexed citations

20.

Koch, Tina. (1994). Beyond measurement: fourth‐generation evaluation in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 20(6). 1148–1155. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact