Mark Lenz
- Surgery top 5%
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 28
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 17
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 15
- Hip and Femur Fractures 13
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 9
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Foot and Ankle Surgery 9
- Tendon Structure and Treatment 6
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Bone fractures and treatments 25
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Boyko GueorguievMarkus WindolfS. M. PerrenR. Geoff RichardsGunther O. HofmannThuioshi IonedaJ. PudlesDankward Höntzsch
- Journals
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (6 papers)Injury (5 papers)International Orthopaedics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Lenz
56 papers receiving 727 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Surgery 622
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 91
- Epidemiology 355
- Microbiology 6
- Rehabilitation 35
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lenz
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lenz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lenz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lenz. The network helps show where Mark Lenz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Lenz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 60 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 5 |
About Mark Lenz
Mark Lenz is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Anatomy and Rehabilitation, having authored 63 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (28 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (25 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (17 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (15 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (13 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (9 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (9 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (622 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (91 citations), Epidemiology (355 citations), Microbiology (6 citations) and Rehabilitation (35 citations). Mark Lenz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Boyko Gueorguiev, Markus Windolf, S. M. Perren, R. Geoff Richards, Gunther O. Hofmann, Thuioshi Ioneda, J. Pudles, Dankward Höntzsch, Thomas Mückley and Kajetan Klos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, Injury, International Orthopaedics, Der Unfallchirurg and Journal of Orthopaedic Translation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.