This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Warren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Warren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Warren more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Warren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Warren. The network helps show where Jim Warren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jim Warren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jim Warren.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jim Warren based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jim Warren. Jim Warren is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gu, Yulong, et al.. (2013). Gender differences in cardiovascular disease risk management for Pacific Islanders in primary care.. PubMed. 21(5). 275–85.10 indexed citations
6.
Warren, Jim, Karen Day, Bruce A. MacDonald, et al.. (2011). Feasibility study of a robotic medication assistant for the elderly. ResearchSpace (University of Auckland). 57–66.21 indexed citations
7.
Gu, Yulong, Jim Warren, & Karen Day. (2010). Helping Clinicians Identify the Clinical Utility of Genetic Tests. 7(1). 41.
8.
Paton, Chris, et al.. (2010). Putting Health Record Interoperability Standards to Work. ResearchSpace (University of Auckland). 5(1). 1.20 indexed citations
9.
Warren, Jim, et al.. (2008). Utilising practice management system data for quality improvement in use of blood pressure lowering medications in general practice.. PubMed. 121(1285). 53–62.7 indexed citations
10.
Piekarski, Wayne, et al.. (2006). Evaluation of user satisfaction and learnability for outdoor augmented reality gaming. 17–24.23 indexed citations
11.
Warren, Jim, et al.. (2003). Consumer Experiences of an Internet Medicine Cabinet. 117.1 indexed citations
12.
Heard, Sam, et al.. (2003). Knowledge management in healthcare. CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University).1 indexed citations
13.
Warren, Jim, Jan Staněk, Svetla Gadzhanova, & Gary Misan. (2003). General Practice Data Mining - Making the Best of Practical and Fundamental Limitations. 271.2 indexed citations
14.
Schrefl, Michael, et al.. (2003). Goal-oriented Workflow Systems Can Help in Chronic Disease Management. 159.1 indexed citations
Franks, James S., et al.. (1999). Age and Growth of Cobia, Rachycentron canadum , from the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Fishery Bulletin. 97(3). 459.53 indexed citations
17.
Warren, Jim, et al.. (1994). Interviewing Expertise in Primary Care Medicine: A Knowledge-Based Support System.. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 173–182.
18.
Warren, Jim. (1992). CASE/simulation systems. University Microfilms International eBooks.2 indexed citations
19.
Warren, Jim, et al.. (1986). Altered coupling of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in pancreatic acinar carcinoma of rat. Fed. Proc., Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol.; (United States).1 indexed citations
20.
Marshall, Barry J., D. I. Annear, C. S. Goodwin, et al.. (1984). Original isolation of Campylobacter pyloridis from human gastric mucosa. 25(28). 83–88.202 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.